Should eponyms be abandoned? No
- PMID: 17762034
- PMCID: PMC1962881
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39308.380567.AD
Should eponyms be abandoned? No
Abstract
Medicine has been enthusiastic in naming tests, symptoms, and diseases after their discovers. Alexander Woywodt and Eric Matteson argue that eponyms are no longer appropriate, but Judith A Whitworth believes they remain a useful reflection of medical history
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests:
Comment in
-
Time to drop eponyms: Curbing Medicalese is the issue.BMJ. 2007 Sep 15;335(7619):528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39332.450995.3A. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17855293 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes.BMJ. 2007 Sep 1;335(7617):424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39308.342639.AD. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17762033 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Who named it? .www.whonamedit.com
-
- World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. .www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online - PubMed
-
- Firkin GB, Whitworth JA, eds. Dictionary of medical eponyms Canforth: Parthenon, 1987
-
- Cameron JS, Becker EL. Richard Bright and observations in renal histology. Guys Hosp Rep 1964;113:159-71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources