The fate of anterior autogenous bone graft after anterior radical surgery with or without posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective clinical study.

Objective: To assess the results of anterior strut grafting and the loss of the reduction in anterior interbody fusion and anterior interbody fusion combined with posterior instrumental fusion in pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Summary of background data: Resorption of the anterior graft is an ominous sign following most anterior surgery. Thus, additional posterior instrumentation has been used to prevent collapse of the anterior graft. However, its effect is controversial, and few studies have examined the fate of the anterior strut graft.

Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The patients were divided into Group I (anterior interbody fusion) and Group II (anterior interbody fusion + posterior instrumented fusion). The sagittal angle, intervertebral height, and complications relating to the anterior graft were compared.

Results: Solid bone fusion was achieved in 23 (95.8%) patients. The sagittal angle and the intervertebral height were similar in Groups I and II (P = 0.61, P = 0.89, respectively). In Groups I and II, the postoperative sagittal angle was maintained until 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05), but it decreased significantly by 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05). In Groups I and II, intervertebral height correction was maintained until 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05), but by 3 months after surgery, it had collapsed significantly (P < 0.05). Subsidence of the graft occurred through the damaged endplate. Group I included 1 case of graft dislodgement necessitating revision; there were no such cases in Group II. There were no recurrences of infection in either group.

Conclusion: Reduction of intervertebral height and loss of sagittal profile occurred in both groups. Complications relating to the bone graft were more common in Group I than in Group II. Despite loss of correction, both groups had a high fusion rate without recurrence of infection. The reduction of intervertebral graft height appears to be the result of destruction of the endplate either due to surgical debridement or the infective process.