[Measuring the blood pressure in both arms is of little use; longitudinal study into blood pressure differences between both arms and its reproducibility in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2]
- PMID: 17763810
[Measuring the blood pressure in both arms is of little use; longitudinal study into blood pressure differences between both arms and its reproducibility in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure differences > 10 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and to determine whether these differences are consistent over time.
Design: Descriptive.
Method: In an evaluation study of 169 DM2 patients from 5 general practices in 2003 and 2004, different methods of oscillatory measurement were used to investigate inter-arm blood pressure differences > 10 mmHg systolic or diastolic. These methods were: one measurement in each arm non-simultaneously (method A), one measurement simultaneously (B) and the mean of two simultaneous measurements (C).
Results: With method A an inter-arm blood pressure difference was found in 33% of patients. This percentage diminished to 9 with method C. In 44% (n = 7) of the patients in whom method C detected a relevant blood pressure difference, this difference was not found with method A. In 79% of patients the inter-arm blood pressure difference was not reproduced after one year.
Conclusion: In daily practice, one non-simultaneous blood pressure measurement in each arm (method A) was of little value for identification of patients with inter-arm blood pressure differences. The reproducibility was poor one year later. Bilateral blood pressure measurement is therefore of little value.
Comment in
-
[Measuring the blood pressure in both arms is subject to discussion].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Jul 7;151(27):1498-9. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17763806 Dutch.
-
[Measuring the blood pressure in both arms].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Oct 6;151(40):2237-8; author reply 2238-9. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17969578 Dutch. No abstract available.
-
[Measuring the blood pressure in both arms].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Oct 6;151(40):2238-9; author reply 2239. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17969579 Dutch. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Inter-arm blood pressure differences in pregnant women.BJOG. 2008 Aug;115(9):1122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01756.x. BJOG. 2008. PMID: 18715433
-
The inter-arm blood pressure difference and peripheral vascular disease: cross-sectional study.Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):420-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm035. Epub 2007 Aug 1. Fam Pract. 2007. PMID: 17670807
-
[Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008 Jun;36(4):239-46. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008. PMID: 18765967 Turkish.
-
[Non-invasive blood pressure measurement in dogs and cats].Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2005 Apr 1;130(7):198-201. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2005. PMID: 15822444 Review. Dutch.
-
Blood pressure measurement method and inter-arm differences: a meta-analysis.Am J Hypertens. 2011 Nov;24(11):1201-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.125. Epub 2011 Jul 21. Am J Hypertens. 2011. PMID: 21776035
Cited by
-
Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference an Indicator of Coronary Artery Disease.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 Jul;30(4):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s40292-023-00591-4. Epub 2023 Jul 7. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023. PMID: 37418105
-
Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov;66(652):e838-e847. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687553. Epub 2016 Oct 10. Br J Gen Pract. 2016. PMID: 27789511 Free PMC article.
-
[Interarm blood pressure difference: Concordance between two methods of automatic simultaneous measurement and between visits reproducibility].Aten Primaria. 2022 Dec;54(12):102514. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102514. Epub 2022 Nov 21. Aten Primaria. 2022. PMID: 36423568 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
The ankle brachial index exhibits better association with cardiovascular outcomes than interarm systolic blood pressure difference in patients with type 2 diabetes.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15556. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015556. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31083218 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between inter-arm difference in systolic blood pressure and arterial stiffness in community-dwelling older adults.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Dec;15(12):880-7. doi: 10.1111/jch.12178. Epub 2013 Aug 7. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013. PMID: 24299691 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical