Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;7(2):103-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-0065-1.

Determining intravenous rt-PA eligibility in the Emergency Department

Affiliations

Determining intravenous rt-PA eligibility in the Emergency Department

Amy C Mecozzi et al. Neurocrit Care. 2007.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement of Emergency Department (ED) attendings, ED residents, and neurology residents compared with stroke neurologists in the assessment of intravenous rt-PA eligibility.

Methods: A convenience sample of patients presenting with possible stroke symptoms to the University of Michigan Hospital ED from June 2003 to July 2004 was identified. A physician from each of four groups: ED attending, ED resident, neurology resident, and stroke neurology attending independently evaluated each patient for eligibility for intravenous (i.v.) rt-PA. Accuracy, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by physician type, compared with the stroke neurologist, for eligibility for i.v. rt-PA.

Results: Exactly 36 (49%) out of the 73 evaluated patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and 11 were deemed eligible for treatment with i.v. tPA by the stroke neurologist. Agreement with the stroke neurologist for rt-PA eligibility was 93% [95% CI: 84%, 98%] (sensitivity = 82% [48%, 98%], PPV = 82% [48%, 99%]) for the ED attendings, 79% [65%, 90%] (sensitivity = 75% [35%, 97%], PPV = 43% [18% 71%]) for the ED residents, and 84% [73%, 92%] (sensitivity = 100% [74%, 100%], PPV = 52% [31%, 73%]) for the neurology residents. There were two false positive cases identified by ED attendings, eight, by ED residents, and 11 by neurology residents.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the agreement between ED attendings and stroke neurologists for determination of rt-PA eligibility is good. There is room for improvement, however, in the determination of acute stroke therapy eligibility in the ED setting especially among trainees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9 - PubMed
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Apr;11(4):361-70 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2497-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2004 Oct 20;292(15):1831-8 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 1994 Oct;25(10):1920-3 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources