Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Mar;65(3):377-85.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03012.x. Epub 2007 Aug 31.

An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial

James F Reeve et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

What is already known about this subject. Computerized prompts and reminders have been shown to be effective in changing the behaviour of health professionals in a variety of settings. There is little literature describing or evaluating electronic decision-support for pharmacists. What this study adds. An electronic prompt in dispensing software for a targeted clinical intervention has a significant effect on pharmacists' behaviour. A markedly increased rate of recording and performing the targeted clinical intervention was found. The effect of the prompt reduces markedly once the prompt is deactivated.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of an electronic prompt in dispensing software on the frequency of clinical interventions recorded by community pharmacists.

Method: An electronic decision-support prompt identifying patients for a targeted proactive clinical intervention was developed and implemented. Each time an oral antidiabetic agent was dispensed, a prompt was displayed reminding pharmacists to discuss the suitability of aspirin therapy in eligible patients with diabetes. The prompt was randomly assigned to 31 of 52 metropolitan pharmacies in Melbourne (Australia) for 6 weeks, with the remaining pharmacies as controls.

Results: One hundred and fifty pharmacists in 52 pharmacies recorded a total of 2396 clinical interventions at an intervention rate of 0.92 interventions per 100 patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58, 1.23]. Pharmacists recorded a total of 201 target interventions related to aspirin therapy in diabetes at an intervention rate of 2.55 interventions per 100 diabetic patients (95% CI 0.85, 4.24). All of the targeted clinical interventions were recorded in the prompt arm; no targeted interventions were recorded in the control group. The effect of the prompt decreased over the study period and was not maintained after prompt deactivation.

Conclusion: An electronic prompt significantly increased pharmacists' recording of the targeted clinical intervention in diabetic patients. An electronic decision-support prompt has significant potential to promote community pharmacists' contribution to the quality use of medicines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ‘prompt’ dialogue in dispensing software indicating a potential clinical intervention. Buttons on the prompt allowed pharmacists to: (a) dismiss the prompt; (b) print a patient leaflet; (c) view background material and a protocol for performing the intervention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interventions (Aspirin and Total) per 100 diabetic or total patients during trial period showing prompt and observer arms
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative aspirin interventions recorded during the 6-week study period and 10-days poststudy with phases indicated
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pharmacist responses to questionnaire about aspirin prompt (medians, with range lines plotted at the 10th and 90th percentile)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Calabretto J-P, Warren J, Bird L. Pharmacy decision support: where is it? A systematic literature review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13:157–64.
    1. Sacchetti A, Sacchetti C, Carraccio C, Gerardi M. The potential for errors in children with special health care needs. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1330–3. - PubMed
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:1223–38. - PubMed
    1. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, Render ML, Orshansky G, Asch SM. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:438–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, Spurr C, Khorasani R, Tanasijevic M, Middleton B. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:523–30. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms