Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Aug 31:7:228.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-228.

Measuring participant rurality in Web-based interventions

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Measuring participant rurality in Web-based interventions

Brian G Danaher et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Web-based health behavior change programs can reach large groups of disparate participants and thus they provide promise of becoming important public health tools. Data on participant rurality can complement other demographic measures to deepen our understanding of the success of these programs. Specifically, analysis of participant rurality can inform recruitment and social marketing efforts, and facilitate the targeting and tailoring of program content. Rurality analysis can also help evaluate the effectiveness of interventions across population groupings.

Methods: We describe how the RUCAs (Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes) methodology can be used to examine results from two Randomized Controlled Trials of Web-based tobacco cessation programs: the ChewFree.com project for smokeless tobacco cessation and the Smokers' Health Improvement Program (SHIP) project for smoking cessation.

Results: Using RUCAs methodology helped to highlight the extent to which both Web-based interventions reached a substantial percentage of rural participants. The ChewFree program was found to have more rural participation which is consistent with the greater prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in rural settings as well as ChewFree's multifaceted recruitment program that specifically targeted rural settings.

Conclusion: Researchers of Web-based health behavior change programs targeted to the US should routinely include RUCAs as a part of analyzing participant demographics. Researchers in other countries should examine rurality indices germane to their country.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeLeon PH, Wakefield M, Hagglund KJ. The behavioral health care needs of rural communities in the 21st century. In: Stamm BH, editor. Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide. Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association; 2003. pp. 23–31.
    1. Horrigan JB. Home broadband adoption 2006. 2006. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband_trends2006.pdf
    1. Bell P, Reddy P, Rainie L. Rural areas and the Internet: Rural Americans' Internet use has grown, but they continue to lag behind others. 2004. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Rural_Report.pdf
    1. Stamm BH. Bridging the rural-urban divide with telehealth and telemedicine . In: Stamm BH, editor. Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide. Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association; 2003. pp. 145–155.
    1. Rickets TC, Johnson-Webb KD, Taylor P. Definitions of rural: A handbook for health policy makers and researchers. 1998 http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/research_programs/rural_program/ruralit.pdf - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms