Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;11(4):226.
doi: 10.1186/cc5966.

Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications

Affiliations
Review

Clinical review: Sleep measurement in critical care patients: research and clinical implications

Richard S Bourne et al. Crit Care. 2007.

Abstract

Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake, particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating various sleep measurement techniques are explored.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47578325.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatterplots of the results of four different techniques used to measure nocturnal sleep in our intervention studies: (a) bispectral index (BIS) quantity versus actigraphy, (b) BIS quantity versus patient assessment (Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire), (c) BIS quantity versus nurse assessment, and (d) nurse assessment versus patient assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland-Altman plots. Horizontal lines are drawn at the mean difference and at the mean difference plus and minus 1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences: (a) bispectral index (BIS) quantity versus actigraphy, (b) BIS quantity versus patient assessment (Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire), (c) BIS quantity versus nurse assessment, and (d) nurse assessment versus patient assessment.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parthasarathy S, Tobin MJ. Sleep in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:197–206. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2030-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinhouse GL, Schwab RJ. Sleep in the critically ill patient. Sleep. 2006;29:707–716. - PubMed
    1. Freedman NS, Kotzer N, Schwab RJ. Patient perception of sleep quality and etiology of sleep disruption in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1155–1162. - PubMed
    1. Gabor JY, Cooper AB, Crombach SA, Lee B, Kadikar N, Bettger HE, Hanly PJ. Contribution of the intensive care unit environment to sleep disruption in mechanically ventilated patients and healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:708–715. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2201090. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourne RS, Mills GH. Sleep disruption in critically ill patients – pharmacological considerations. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:374–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03664.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data