A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming
- PMID: 17765207
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.011
A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming
Abstract
We report first results of a multilevel, cross-modal study on the neuronal mechanisms underlying auditory sequential streaming, with the focus on the impact of visual sequences on perceptually ambiguous tone sequences which can either be perceived as two separate streams or one alternating stream. We combined two psychophysical experiments performed on humans and monkeys with two human brain imaging experiments which allow to obtain complementary information on brain activation with high spatial (fMRI) and high temporal (MEG) resolution. The same acoustic paradigm based on the pairing of tone sequences with visual stimuli was used in all human studies and, in an adapted version, in the psychophysical study on monkeys. Our multilevel approach provides experimental evidence that the pairing of auditory and visual stimuli can reliably introduce a bias towards either an integrated or a segregated perception of ambiguous sequences. Thus, comparable to an explicit instruction, this approach can be used to control the subject's perceptual organization of an ambiguous sound sequence without the need for the subject to directly report it. This finding is of particular importance for animal studies because it allows to compare electrophysiological responses of auditory cortex neurons to the same acoustic stimulus sequence eliciting either a segregated or integrated percept.
Similar articles
-
Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques.Neuron. 2005 Oct 6;48(1):139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.039. Neuron. 2005. PMID: 16202714
-
Cross-modal interactions during perception of audiovisual speech and nonspeech signals: an fMRI study.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):221-37. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21421. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20044895
-
Attention modulates sound processing in human auditory cortex but not the inferior colliculus.Neuroreport. 2007 Aug 27;18(13):1311-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32826fb3bb. Neuroreport. 2007. PMID: 17762703
-
Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream.Brain Res. 2008 Jul 18;1220:179-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.013. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18096139 Review.
-
The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams.J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(1-3):154-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3. J Physiol Paris. 2006. PMID: 17084600 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of lip-reading on primary stream segregation.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):283-91. doi: 10.1121/1.3592223. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 21786898 Free PMC article.
-
Representation of Auditory Task Components and of Their Relationships in Primate Auditory Cortex.Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 21;14:306. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00306. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32372903 Free PMC article.
-
Decision making and ambiguity in auditory stream segregation.Front Neurosci. 2015 Aug 11;9:266. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00266. eCollection 2015. Front Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26321899 Free PMC article.
-
Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jan;29(1):205-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06561.x. Epub 2008 Dec 12. Eur J Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19087164 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.Trends Neurosci. 2011 Mar;34(3):114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 31. Trends Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21196054 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources