Pavlovian backward conditioned inhibition in humans: summation and retardation tests
- PMID: 17766058
- PMCID: PMC2293975
- DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.07.003
Pavlovian backward conditioned inhibition in humans: summation and retardation tests
Abstract
Two experiments using human participants investigated whether a Pavlovian backward inhibitory treatment (nonreinforced trials in phase 1 followed by reinforced trials in phase 2; i.e., AX- followed by A+) produces a stimulus which can pass summation and retardation tests for inhibition. The rationale for conducting these experiments was that previous demonstrations of Pavlovian backward inhibition informed participants about the nature of the outcome before starting the experiment. According to some theoretical views, this is a potential confound. In the present experiments we used a predictive task in which participants had no knowledge about the outcome until phase 2, when reinforcement occurred. The results of Experiment 1 (summation test) and Experiment 2 (retardation test) provide a clear demonstration of backward conditioned inhibition.
Similar articles
-
Outcome-specific conditioned inhibition in Pavlovian backward conditioning.Learn Behav. 2003 Nov;31(4):393-402. doi: 10.3758/bf03196000. Learn Behav. 2003. PMID: 14733487
-
Changes in inhibition during differential eyeblink conditioning with increased training.Learn Behav. 2008 May;36(2):159-65. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.2.159. Learn Behav. 2008. PMID: 18543716 Free PMC article.
-
Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training.Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):103-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.103. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008. PMID: 18605488 Free PMC article.
-
A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):271-83. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.271. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006. PMID: 16834494 Free PMC article.
-
Extinction of Pavlovian conditioning: The influence of trial number and reinforcement history.Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 1. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28473250 Review.
Cited by
-
Alcohol cues impair learning inhibitory signals in beer drinkers.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 May;39(5):880-6. doi: 10.1111/acer.12690. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015. PMID: 25872597 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining compound generalization in associative and causal learning through rational principles of dimensional generalization.Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;121(3):526-58. doi: 10.1037/a0037018. Psychol Rev. 2014. PMID: 25090430 Free PMC article.
-
An elemental model of retrospective revaluation without within-compound associations.Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):22-38. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0112-z. Learn Behav. 2014. PMID: 23813103
-
An instance theory of associative learning.Learn Behav. 2012 Mar;40(1):61-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0046-2. Learn Behav. 2012. PMID: 21913057
References
-
- Aitken MR, Dickinson A. Simulations of a modified SOP model applied to retrospective revaluation in human causal learning. Learning & Behavior. 2005;33:147–159. - PubMed
-
- Baker AG, Murphy RA, Mehta R. Learned irrelevance and retrospective correlation learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2003;56B:90–101. - PubMed
-
- Chapman GB. Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1991;17:837–854. - PubMed
-
- Cook SW, Harris RE. The verbal conditioning of the galvanic skin response. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1937;21:202–210.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources