Comparison of uncovered stent with covered stent for treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction
- PMID: 17767930
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.064
Comparison of uncovered stent with covered stent for treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction
Abstract
Background: Insertion of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) can provide rapid relief of malignant colorectal obstruction and can be used as a palliative treatment or as a bridge to surgery. A SEMS can be classified as an uncovered or covered stent. Both types of stents have their own merits and demerits.
Objective: The objectives of this study were to compare success rates, durability, and complication rates of uncovered and covered stent groups of malignant colorectal obstruction. DESIGNS AND SETTING: A nonrandomized prospective, single-center study.
Methods: We studied 80 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction: colon cancer in 70 patients, metastatic lesion of advanced gastric cancer in 8 patients, and cervix cancer in 2 patients. Insertion of uncovered stents was attempted in 39 patients (before surgery in 20, palliative in 19), and covered stents were used in 41 (before surgery in 23, palliative in 18).
Intervention: The stent was inserted into the obstructive sites for preoperative or palliative purposes by using the through-the-scope method. After stent insertion, the patients had regular follow-ups, either as clinical checkups or telephone interviews.
Main outcome measurement: Insertion success rate, durability, and complication rate according to stent type.
Results: Technical and clinical success rates of uncovered and covered stents were not different (100%; 95.1%, P > .05, 100%; 97.4%, P > .05). The early stent migration rate was not different in both groups. The late stent migration was more common in the covered stent group than the uncovered stent group (0% vs 40%, respectively, P = .005). Loss of stent function during the long-term follow-up period was more frequent in the covered stent group than in the uncovered stent group (18.8% vs 60%, respectively, P = .018).
Limitation: This was a small-sized, nonrandomized, prospective, single-center study. Confirmation of large-scale, multicenter, randomized, prospective outcome is required.
Conclusions: Insertion of either an uncovered or covered stent is similarly an effective treatment modality of malignant colorectal obstruction for preoperative purposes. However, there are no advantages of covered stents over uncovered stents during the follow-up period in the palliative purpose.
Similar articles
-
Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of malignant pyloric obstruction in gastric cancer patients: a randomized, prospective study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.039. Epub 2010 Apr 9. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20381802 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Wallstent and Ultraflex stents for palliation of malignant left-sided colon obstruction: a retrospective, case-matched analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):478-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.043. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18294511
-
Comparison of a newly designed double-layered combination covered stent and D-weave uncovered stent for decompression of obstructive colorectal cancer: a prospective multicenter study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Aug;53(8):1190-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e28847. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010. PMID: 20628284 Clinical Trial.
-
Self-expanding metal stents in malignant colonic obstruction: have we covered all angles?Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):937-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.003. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17963880 Review. No abstract available.
-
Endoscopic stenting of colonic tumours.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Feb;18(1):209-29. doi: 10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00098-2. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15123093 Review.
Cited by
-
The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal Dis. 2021 Feb;23(2):476-547. doi: 10.1111/codi.15503. Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33470518 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Expanding Metallic Stents for the Management of Emergency Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: a Systematic Review.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb;20(2):455-62. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2997-7. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 26501483
-
Oncologic outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent insertion as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided colon cancer obstruction: comparison with nonobstructing elective surgery.World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1281-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0007-5. World J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19363580
-
Fluoroscopic management of complications after colorectal stent placement.Gut Liver. 2010 Sep;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-S18. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.S1.S9. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Gut Liver. 2010. PMID: 21103302 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and prospective studies comparing covered and bare self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of malignant obstruction in the digestive tract.Int J Med Sci. 2013 Apr 27;10(7):825-35. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5969. Print 2013. Int J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23794946 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical