Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Mar;23(3):283-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0380-1. Epub 2007 Sep 2.

Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

B Lefebure et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage is a major concern after resection for low rectal cancer. Therefore, the use of a defunctioning stoma (DS) has been suggested, but limited data exist to clearly determine the necessity of a routine diversion. In our department, the indication of DS was evaluated subjectively by the operating surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the selective use of fecal diversion.

Materials and methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent low anterior resection for carcinoma was performed. The incidence and consequences of clinical leaks were determined in these patients who were considered in two groups: defunctioning stoma and no defunctioning stoma.

Results: From 1995 to 2005, 132 consecutive patients underwent low anterior resection; a DS was performed in 42 patients (31.8%). Median level of anastomosis was 4 cm in both groups. Overall clinical leakage rate was 9.8%: 7.1% (n = 3) with a DS and 11% (n = 10) without a stoma. Mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 2), both in the unprotected group. No patient in the diversion group required a permanent stoma, contrasting with four unprotected patients in which continuity could not be restored after break down of the anastomosis.

Conclusion: Finding lower clinical leakage rate in a probable higher risk group and better outcome when a leak occurs in our study constituted strong evidence of the effectiveness of a DS. Selective use of a DS based on subjective assessment at the time of surgery could not allow experienced surgeons to perform single-stage procedure safely. Construction of a DS seems useful for patients with distal rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surgery. 1999 May;125(5):529-35 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2000 Apr;231(4):613-4 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):60-2 - PubMed
    1. Eur Surg Res. 2000;32(4):246-50 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1996 Mar;83(3):375-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources