Vertebrate craniofacial development: the relation between ontogenetic process and morphological outcome
- PMID: 1777804
- DOI: 10.1159/000114388
Vertebrate craniofacial development: the relation between ontogenetic process and morphological outcome
Abstract
Many structures that are present, often transiently, in the head of extant vertebrate embryos appear to be segmentally organized. These include the brain, particularly the hindbrain (e.g., rhombomeres), and adjacent axial structures such as paraxial mesoderm (e.g., somites, somitomeres) and neural crest cells. Also present in the head are additional sets of serially arranged structures that develop in more ventral and lateral locations. Examples of these are epibranchial placodes, aortic arches, and pharyngeal pouches. All these embryonic structures are frequently used both individually and collectively as characters to assist in defining homologies. New cell labeling and identification methods are providing detailed accounts of cell movements and tissue lineages that reveal a range of disparate behaviors not previously appreciated. The well-known migrations of neural crest cells bring all but the neurogenic members of this mesenchymal population form dorsal, axial locations into ventral and rostral locations where they largely surround the pharynx, stomdeum, and prosencephalon. Equally dramatic movements of neural plate cells, myoblasts, angioblasts, and placode-derived cells have recently been documented. These movements may occur in concert with those of other nearby tissues (e.g., branchiomeric myoblasts, neural crest cells, and surface ectoderm) or may be independent (e.g., placodal neuroblasts). Migrating cells may be clustered and follow definable pathways towards their destination (e.g., neural crest cells), or they may be solitary and wander invasively without a prespecified destination (e.g., angioblasts). These extensive morphogenetic movements bring cells into contact with a greater variety of other tissues and matrix environments than has heretofore been recognized. Moreover, because of these rearrangements, the cells present in a particular location, such as a branchial arch, may trace their ancestry to many axial levels, which complicates the analyses of segmental relations. Comparative morphological studies of craniofacial development have recently been augmented by descriptions of the sites and times of expression of many matrix components, growth factors and their receptors, and regulatory genes. Particularly important has been the discovery of a network of genes called the homeobox family. These genes are similar in their sequence and their organization along a chromosome to genes that establish the spatial identity of prospective body parts in drosophila. The combination of cellular and molecular descriptive studies of vertebrate craniofacial development provide exciting opportunities to catalogue patterns of gene expression and morphogenesis during the gastrula, neurula, and early organogenesis stages. Moreover, such data form the basis for proposing and then testing hypotheses about the mechanisms controlling cell movements, tissue formation, and the assembly of functionally integrated sets of structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Cell movements and control of patterned tissue assembly during craniofacial development.J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):192-213. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1991. PMID: 1812125 Review.
-
Spatial distribution of postotic crest cells defines the head/trunk interface of the vertebrate body: embryological interpretation of peripheral nerve morphology and evolution of the vertebrate head.Anat Embryol (Berl). 1997 Jan;195(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s004290050020. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1997. PMID: 9006711 Review.
-
Morphogenesis of the cranial segments and distribution of neural crest in the embryos of the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina.Dev Biol. 1984 Apr;102(2):309-23. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90196-9. Dev Biol. 1984. PMID: 6706002
-
Interactions and fates of avian craniofacial mesenchyme.Development. 1988;103 Suppl:121-40. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.Supplement.121. Development. 1988. PMID: 3074905 Review.
-
Development of branchiomeric and lateral line nerves in the axolotl.J Comp Neurol. 1995 May 8;355(3):427-54. doi: 10.1002/cne.903550309. J Comp Neurol. 1995. PMID: 7636024
Cited by
-
Histomorphogenesis of cranial nerves in Huso huso larvae.Vet Res Forum. 2016 Spring;7(2):111-6. Epub 2016 Jun 15. Vet Res Forum. 2016. PMID: 27482355 Free PMC article.
-
The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29;356(1414):1633-53. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0917. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001. PMID: 11604128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Kir2.1 is important for efficient BMP signaling in mammalian face development.Dev Biol. 2018 Dec 1;444 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S297-S307. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Dev Biol. 2018. PMID: 29571612 Free PMC article.
-
On the Maxillofacial Development of Mice, Mus musculus.J Morphol. 2025 Mar;286(3):e70032. doi: 10.1002/jmor.70032. J Morphol. 2025. PMID: 40022452 Free PMC article.
-
Taste receptor cells arise from local epithelium, not neurogenic ectoderm.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):1916-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.1916. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995. PMID: 7892199 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials