Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):685-701.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2178.

Soil health in agricultural systems

Affiliations
Review

Soil health in agricultural systems

M G Kibblewhite et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Soil health is presented as an integrative property that reflects the capacity of soil to respond to agricultural intervention, so that it continues to support both the agricultural production and the provision of other ecosystem services. The major challenge within sustainable soil management is to conserve ecosystem service delivery while optimizing agricultural yields. It is proposed that soil health is dependent on the maintenance of four major functions: carbon transformations; nutrient cycles; soil structure maintenance; and the regulation of pests and diseases. Each of these functions is manifested as an aggregate of a variety of biological processes provided by a diversity of interacting soil organisms under the influence of the abiotic soil environment. Analysis of current models of the soil community under the impact of agricultural interventions (particularly those entailing substitution of biological processes with fossil fuel-derived energy or inputs) confirms the highly integrative pattern of interactions within each of these functions and leads to the conclusion that measurement of individual groups of organisms, processes or soil properties does not suffice to indicate the state of the soil health. A further conclusion is that quantifying the flow of energy and carbon between functions is an essential but non-trivial task for the assessment and management of soil health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationships between the activities of the soil biological community and a range of ecosystem goods and services that society might expect from agricultural soils. OM, organic matter; SOM, soil organic matter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Major trophic relationships in the soil biological community of an agricultural soil under zero tillage (adapted with permission from Hendrix et al. (1986)).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interconnectedness between the major ecosystem functions of soil. The arrows hypothesize two flows of energy from the plant to the major functions of the soil biota; either directly through the actions of herbivory, parasitism and mutualistic symbiosis, or indirectly via heterotrophic carbon-transforming processes in the soil. Soil organic matter (SOM) synthesis is pictured as supported by energy flowing from the decomposition of plant residues and contributing energy in its turn directly (i.e. by virtue of its properties) to soil structure maintenance and indirectly, through its own decomposition, to nutrient cycling and biological population regulation. See text for further explanation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Performance curve showing an idealized relationship between input(s) to the soil system and delivery of an output of an ecosystem service. The capacity of the system is the output above which process performance deteriorates.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Differences in soil communities (shown in relation to their body size), carbon and nitrogen in mechanized versus no-tillage agriculture averaged for 106 studies across a variety of site conditions (adapted with permission from Wardle 1995). The index V is a measure of the abundance or mass of organisms under mechanized as compared with no-tillage; a value of zero implies equal abundance in each treatment, negative values indicate inhibition by mechanized tillage to a maximum of −1, i.e. the state in which the organisms only occur under no-till (see original paper for further details).

References

    1. Abaye D.A, Lawlor K, Hirsch P.R, Brookes P.C. Changes in the microbial community of an arable soil caused by long-term metal contamination. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2005;56:93–102. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00648.x - DOI
    1. Bardgett R.D, Usher M.B, Hopkins D.W, editors. Biological diversity and function in soils. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2005.
    1. Barros M.E, Grimaldi M, Sarrazin M, Chauvel A, Mitja D, Desjardins D, Lavelle P. Soil physical degradation and changes in macrofaunal communities in Central Amazonia. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2004;26:157–168. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.012 - DOI
    1. Bossio D.A, et al. Soil microbial community response to land use change in an agricultural landscape of Western Kenya. Microb. Ecol. 2005;49:50–62. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-0209-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brussaard, L. (ed.) 1994 Soil ecology of conventional and integrated farming systems Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 51, 1–267.

LinkOut - more resources