Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution
- PMID: 17788203
- DOI: 10.1126/science.147.3655.250
Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution
Abstract
Most plant communities consist of several or many species which compete for light, water, and nutrients. Species in a given community may be ranked by their relative success in competition; productivity seems to be the best measure of their success or importance in the community. Curves of decreasing productivity connect the few most important species (the dominants) with a larger number of species of intermediate importance (whose number primarily determines the community's diversity or richness in species) and a smaller number of rare species. These curves are of varied forms and are believed to express different patterns of competition and niche differentiation in communities. It is probably true of plants, as of animals, that no two species in a stable community occupy the same niche. Evolution of niche differentiation makes possible the occurrence together of many plant species which are partial, rather than direct, competitors. Species tend to evolve also toward habitat differentiation, toward scattering of their centers of maximum population density in relation to environmental gradients, so that few species are competing with one another in their population centers. Evolution of both niche and habitat differentiation permits many species to exist together in communities as partial competitors, with distributions broadly and continuously overlapping, forming the landscape's many intergrading communities.
Similar articles
-
Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00935.x. Ecol Lett. 2006. PMID: 16796565
-
Evidence that niche specialization explains species-energy relationships in lake fish communities.J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):285-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01350.x. Epub 2007 Dec 20. J Anim Ecol. 2008. PMID: 18179548
-
When competition does not matter: grassland diversity and community composition.Am Nat. 2008 Jun;171(6):777-87. doi: 10.1086/587528. Am Nat. 2008. PMID: 18426341
-
Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra.Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):68-71. doi: 10.1038/415068a. Nature. 2002. PMID: 11780117
-
Species abundance distributions and numerical dominance in gastrointestinal helminth communities of fish hosts.J Helminthol. 2008 Sep;82(3):193-202. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X08982626. Epub 2008 Jun 10. J Helminthol. 2008. PMID: 18544177
Cited by
-
Effects of cyclone-generated disturbance on a tropical reef foraminifera assemblage.Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 29;6:24846. doi: 10.1038/srep24846. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27126520 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying species diversity with a DNA barcoding-based method: Tibetan moth species (Noctuidae) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064428. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23741330 Free PMC article.
-
Colonization process determines species diversity via competitive quasi-exclusion.Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 16;11(9):4470-4480. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7342. eCollection 2021 May. Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 33976823 Free PMC article.
-
Functional roles affect diversity-succession relationships for boreal beetles.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e72764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072764. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23977350 Free PMC article.
-
Macrobenthic surveys as a valuable tool for assessing freshwater quality in the Iberian Peninsula.Environ Monit Assess. 1993 Jan;24(1):71-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00568800. Environ Monit Assess. 1993. PMID: 24227197
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources