Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors
- PMID: 1780204
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03207541
Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors
Abstract
Adult subjects were presented with two auditory stimuli per trial, and their task was to decide which of the two was longer in duration. An adaptive psychophysical procedure was used. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4, the base duration was 50 msec, whereas in Experiment 3, the base duration was 1 sec. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4, it was found that filled intervals (continuous tones) were discriminated more accurately than empty intervals (with onset and offset marked by clicks). It was concluded that this difference was perceptual rather than cognitive in nature, since performance on filled and empty intervals was not affected by increasing cognitive load in a dual-task procedure (Experiment 2) but was affected by backward masking (Experiment 4). In contrast, the results of Experiment 3 showed that duration discrimination of filled auditory intervals of longer duration was cognitively influenced, since performance was impaired by increasing cognitive load. Implications for notions of perceptual processing and timing mechanism underlying differences in duration discrimination with filled and empty intervals are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1591-600. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1591. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20675803
-
Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.Percept Psychophys. 1993 Sep;54(3):383-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03205274. Percept Psychophys. 1993. PMID: 8414897
-
Temporal discrimination as a function of marker duration.Percept Psychophys. 1996 Nov;58(8):1213-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03207554. Percept Psychophys. 1996. PMID: 8961832
-
Effects of practice and signal energy on duration discrimination of brief auditory intervals.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Apr;55(4):454-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03205302. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8036124
-
The Processing of Short Time Intervals: Some Critical Issues.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:35-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_3. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38918345 Review.
Cited by
-
Cognitive Load Affects Numerical and Temporal Judgments in Distinct Ways.Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01783. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30333769 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual learning in auditory temporal discrimination: no evidence for a cross-modal transfer to the visual modality.Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):382-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.382. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009. PMID: 19293111
-
Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of intervals in the subsecond and second range.Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 26;6:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01626. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26579013 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of a Regular Auditory Context on Perceived Interval Duration.Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01567. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30254590 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal specificity of perceptual learning in an auditory discrimination task.Learn Mem. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):141-7. doi: 10.1101/lm.55503. Learn Mem. 2003. PMID: 12663752 Free PMC article.