Similar articles

• On: the case against neuropsychoanalysis.

  Mancia M. Mancia M. Int J Psychoanal. 2007 Aug;88(Pt 4):1065-7; author reply 1068-70. Int J Psychoanal. 2007. PMID: 17802651 No abstract available.
• [Neuropsychoanalysis: the science of the unconscious in the 21st century: definition and scientific roots].

  Németh N. Németh N. Psychiatr Hung. 2011;26(5):290-310. Psychiatr Hung. 2011. PMID: 22232520 Review. Hungarian.
• The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse.

  Blass RB, Carmeli Z. Blass RB, et al. Int J Psychoanal. 2007 Feb;88(Pt 1):19-40. doi: 10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj. Int J Psychoanal. 2007. PMID: 17244565
• Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism.

  Westen D, Gabbard GO. Westen D, et al. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2002 Winter;50(1):53-98. doi: 10.1177/00030651020500011501. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2002. PMID: 12018875
• The case for neuropsychoanalysis: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis.

  Yovell Y, Solms M, Fotopoulou A. Yovell Y, et al. Int J Psychoanal. 2015 Dec;96(6):1515-53. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12332. Epub 2015 Jul 30. Int J Psychoanal. 2015. PMID: 26227821 Review.