Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Aug 15;3(5):495-504.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ramelteon in subjects with chronic insomnia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ramelteon in subjects with chronic insomnia

Gary Zammit et al. J Clin Sleep Med. .

Erratum in

  • J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Oct 15;3(6):table of contents
  • J Clin Sleep Med. 2008 Oct 15;4(5):table of contents

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of ramelteon (MT1/MT2-receptor [corrected] agonist) in subjects with chronic primary insomnia.

Methods: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nightly ramelteon treatment (8 mg or 16 mg) in adults (N=405) with primary chronic insomnia (DSM-IV-TR). Latency to persistent sleep (LPS), TST, sleep efficiency, wake time after sleep onset, and number of awakenings were measured by polysomnography. Subject-reported measures were also assessed.

Results: LPS at Week 1 (primary measure) was significantly shorter with ramelteon 8 mg (32.2 min) or 16 mg (28.9 min) vs placebo (47.9 min; p <0.001). Significant improvements in LPS were maintained at Weeks 3 and 5. TST was significantly longer with both doses of ramelteon at Week 1 (p <0.001) vs placebo. Subject-reported sleep latency was significantly shorter with ramelteon 8 mg at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 (p <0.001) and ramelteon 16 mg at Weeks 1 and 3 (p < or =0.050) vs placebo. Wake time after sleep onset and number of awakenings were not significantly different with ramelteon 8 mg or 16 mg treatment vs placebo. Subjective TST was significantly longer with ramelteon 8 mg at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 (p < or =0.050) and ramelteon 16 mg at Week 1 (p = 0.003) vs placebo. Ramelteon had no clinically meaningful effect on sleep architecture, next-morning psychomotor tasks, alertness, or ability to concentrate. No withdrawal or rebound effects were observed.

Conclusions: Ramelteon reduced LPS over 5 weeks of treatment in subjects with chronic insomnia, with no clinically meaningful sleep architecture alterations, next-morning residual pharmacologic effects, and no evidence of rebound insomnia or withdrawal. No numerical differences were observed between the 2 doses of ramelteon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PSG-determined latency to persistent sleep: ramelteon vs placebo treatments. Least-squares mean LPS at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 of double-blind treatment. For comparisons of ramelteon dose and placebo: ***p ≤0.001; **p ≤0.010.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change from baseline latency to persistent sleep. Least-squares mean change from baseline for PSG LPS at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 of double-blind treatment. For comparisons of ramelteon dose and placebo: ***p ≤0.001; **p ≤0.010.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PSG-determined total sleep time and sleep efficiency: comparison of ramelteon and placebo treatments. Least-squares mean TST and sleep efficiency at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 of double-blind treatment. Sleep efficiency was defined as the TST divided by time-in-bed, multiplied by 100. For comparisons of ramelteon dose and placebo: ***p ≤0.001; *p ≤0.050.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roth T, Roehrs T. Insomnia: epidemiology, characteristics, and consequences. Clin Cornerstone. 2003;5:5–15. - PubMed
    1. Shochat T, Umphress J, Israel AG, Ancoli-Israel S. Insomnia in primary care patients. Sleep. 1999;22:S359–65. - PubMed
    1. Allain H, Bentue-Ferrer D, Tarral A, Gandon J. Effects on postural oscillation and memory functions of a single dose of zolpidem 5 mg, zopiclone 3.75 mg and lormetazepam 1 mg in elderly healthy subjects. A randomized, cross-over, double-blind study versus placebo. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59:179–88. - PubMed
    1. Roehrs T, Merlotti L, Zorick F, Roth T. Sedative, memory, and performance effects of hypnotics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994;116:130–4. - PubMed
    1. Mintzer MZ, Frey JM, Yingling JE, Griffiths RR. Triazolam and zolpidem: a comparison of their psychomotor, cognitive, and subjective effects in healthy volunteers. Behav Pharmacol. 1997;8:561–74. - PubMed

Publication types