Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):R751-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.039.

Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces

Jason Haberman  1 , David Whitney
Affiliations

Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces

Jason Haberman et al. Curr Biol. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample trials and results for the three experiments
(A,B) To discriminate whether a test face was happier or sadder than a previously viewed set of homogeneous faces with 75% accuracy, the test face had to be 3–4 units happier or sadder than the set (experiment 1). The test face in (A) is 6 units happier than the set. (C,D) Observers were at chance when indicating which of two test faces was a member of the preceding heterogeneous set (experiment 2), suggesting that they had not retained any information about the set’s individual identities. The target in (C) is the top face. (E,F) Observers indicated whether the test face was happier or sadder than the mean emotion of the preceding set (experiment 3). Despite lacking a representation of the individual set members (D), observers had a remarkably precise representation of the mean emotion of that set. Their 75% correct discrimination of the mean emotion of the set was almost as precise as their ability to discriminate two faces that displayed different emotions (compare B and F). The test face in (E) is 4 units sadder than the mean emotion of the set. Error bars in (B and F) indicate 95% confidence intervals based on 5000 Monte Carlo simulations [11], and error bars in (D) are ± 1 SEM.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ariely D. Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychol. Sci. 2001;12:157–162. - PubMed
    1. Chong SC, Treisman A. Representation of statistical properties. Vision Res. 2003;43:393–404. - PubMed
    1. Parkes L, Lund J, Angelucci A, Solomon JA, Morgan M. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nat. Neurosci. 2001;4:739–744. - PubMed
    1. Cavanagh P. Seeing the forest but not the trees. Nat. Neurosci. 2001;4:673–674. - PubMed
    1. Nakayama K, He ZJ, Shimojo S. Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In: Kosslyn SM, Osherson DN, editors. An Invitation to Cognitive Science. 2 Edition. Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. pp. 1–70.

LinkOut - more resources