Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States: declining utilization despite improving outcomes
- PMID: 17804675
- DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2006101130
Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States: declining utilization despite improving outcomes
Abstract
In the United States, chronic peritoneal dialysis take-on has declined among incident ESRD patients. Although increasing age, co-morbidity, and body size may explain part of this decline, other factors likely contribute. Among incident ESRD patients in the United States, we found that peritoneal dialysis take-on significantly decreased from 11% in 1996 to 1997 to 7% in 2002 to 2003 (P < 0.001 for the trend). This decrease remained after adjusting for patient demographics, case-mix, and laboratory data, suggesting the involvement of other factors. This decline in utilization occurred during a time of improving outcomes for incident peritoneal dialysis patients, measured as reduced hazards for death or for the need to transfer to hemodialysis. In contrast, among patients initially treated with hemodialysis, the 12-month adjusted hazards for death or transfer to peritoneal dialysis slightly worsened or were unchanged over this same period. Therefore, the decline in peritoneal dialysis take-on cannot be entirely explained by increasing age, co-morbidity and body size of incident ESRD patients. The decline in utilization has occurred at a time when the early outcomes of CPD patients have improved.
Similar articles
-
Dialysis therapy among elderly patients; data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 1981-1991.Adv Perit Dial. 1993;9:124-9. Adv Perit Dial. 1993. PMID: 8105905
-
Declining trend of peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience.Adv Perit Dial. 2002;18:100-5. Adv Perit Dial. 2002. PMID: 12402598
-
Is the declining use of long-term peritoneal dialysis justified by outcome data?Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Nov;2(6):1317-28. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02550607. Epub 2007 Oct 17. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. PMID: 17942769 Review.
-
Mortality differences between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis among ESRD patients in Georgia.Georgian Med News. 2007 Feb;(143):27-30. Georgian Med News. 2007. PMID: 17404434
-
The future of peritoneal dialysis in the United States: optimizing its use.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Dec;4 Suppl 1:S125-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04760709. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19995996 Review.
Cited by
-
Behavioral stage of change and dialysis decision-making.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):197-204. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05560614. Epub 2015 Jan 15. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25591499 Free PMC article.
-
[Significance of predialysis preparation and patient information in choosing the dialysis method].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2013 Jun;163(11-12):266-70. doi: 10.1007/s10354-013-0192-6. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23604627 Review. German.
-
Choice of dialysis modality prior to kidney transplantation: Does it matter?World J Nephrol. 2019 Jan 21;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v8.i1.1. World J Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 30705867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of serum total iron-binding capacity and its changes over time with nutritional and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients.Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(6):571-81. doi: 10.1159/000191470. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Am J Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19136818 Free PMC article.
-
The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3238-3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112. Epub 2016 Jun 23. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 27339663 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical