Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs
- PMID: 17825024
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00734.x
Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs
Abstract
Interest often focuses on estimating sensitivity and specificity of a group of raters or a set of new diagnostic tests in situations in which gold standard evaluation is expensive or invasive. Various authors have proposed semilatent class modeling approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy in this situation. This article presents imputation approaches for this problem. I show how imputation provides a simpler way of performing diagnostic accuracy and prevalence estimation than the use of semilatent modeling. Furthermore, the imputation approach is more robust to modeling assumptions and, in general, there is only a moderate efficiency loss relative to a correctly specified semilatent class model. I apply imputation to a study designed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of digital radiography for gastric cancer. The feasibility and robustness of imputation is illustrated with analysis, asymptotic results, and simulations.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.Prev Vet Med. 2005 Apr;68(1):19-33. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.01.006. Prev Vet Med. 2005. PMID: 15795013 Review.
-
Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.Stat Med. 2008 Dec 10;27(28):5880-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3410. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 18752256
-
Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):600-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00324.x. Biometrics. 2005. PMID: 16011710
-
A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.Stat Med. 2003 Sep 15;22(17):2711-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.1517. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 12939781
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19461821 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223832. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31603953 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4141-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6218. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Stat Med. 2014. PMID: 24910172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose tests in the screening of outpatients for diabetes and abnormal glucose regulation in Uganda: A diagnostic accuracy study.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0272515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272515. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35925994 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous inference of a misclassified outcome and competing risks failure time data.J Appl Stat. 2015;42(5):1080-1090. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2014.995606. J Appl Stat. 2015. PMID: 25821331 Free PMC article.
-
A Universal and Efficient Detection of Chytridiomycosis Infections in Amphibians Using Novel Quantitative PCR Markers.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023 Apr 30;2023:9980566. doi: 10.1155/2023/9980566. eCollection 2023. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023. PMID: 40303665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical