Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Nov;49(5):313-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF02556252.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius

R S Weinstein et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991 Nov.

Abstract

Radial diaphyseal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the standard one-third site by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by 125I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) in 70 consecutive subjects, aged 12-86 years, with metabolic disorders of the skeleton. Each patient was measured once by the DEXA (Hologic QDR-1000) instrument and four times by the SPA (Norland 2780) instrument on the same day by one or the other of 2 technicians. The DEXA and SPA measurements were linearly related and highly correlated (r = 0.975, P less than 0.0001) over a range from severe osteopenia to high normal BMD. Ninety-five percent of the variation in the BMD determined by SPA was accounted for by DEXA, so that the BMD(SPA) = 1.035 +/- 0.027 (SEM) x BMD(DEXA)-0.007 +/- 0.019 (SEM). This permits continued use of previously accumulated SPA data-bases. The coefficient of variation for repeat measurements by DEXA was 1.2% and by SPA 1.6%. Examination time by DEXA was 6-7 minutes, about 45% shorter than the corresponding SPA determinations. DEXA is the superior method for evaluation of the radius, as it provides faster and more precise measurements in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Invest. 1985 Dec;76(6):2403-12 - PubMed
    1. Calcif Tissue Int. 1990 Oct;47(4):191-3 - PubMed
    1. Bone. 1989;10(1):3-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1989 Jan;83(1):168-74 - PubMed
    1. Metabolism. 1989 Feb;38(2):159-65 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources