Reconstruction of rapidly acquired Germanium-68 transmission scans for cardiac PET attenuation correction
- PMID: 17826324
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.05.009
Reconstruction of rapidly acquired Germanium-68 transmission scans for cardiac PET attenuation correction
Abstract
Background: Transmission (TX) scan time by use of radionuclide sources for cardiac positron emission tomography prolong imaging and increase the likelihood of patient motion artifacts. A reconstruction algorithm combining ordered-subsets expectation maximization with a Bayesian prior was developed and applied to rapid Germanium-68 (Ge-68) TX scans.
Methods and results: A cardiac phantom with Fluorine-18 (Fl-18) was used to determine a minimal count threshold for Ge-68 TX scanning. Images were acquired over a count range from 2.5 x 10(6) to 8 x 10(7) and for a high-count scan of 1.6 x 10(9) counts to study reconstruction parameters and to determine the minimum TX count threshold. The method was compared against clinical 4-minute TX scans in ten Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) rest/stress myocardial perfusion studies (body mass index, 30 +/- 4 kg/m(2)). The minimal count threshold was 20 x 10(6), and the mean scan time for the Rb-82 studies was 70.5 +/- 3.4 seconds. More than 90% of the segmental scores computed from images acquired via rapid TX scans differed by less than 5% from those obtained with 4-minute TX scans. The mean differences in perfusion scores between the rapid and 4-minute TX scans were 0.46% (95% confidence interval, -1.84% to 0.93%) at rest and 0.39% (95% confidence interval, -1.84% to 1.07%) at stress, demonstrating equivalency of the rapid and 4-minute scans.
Conclusions: Ordered-subsets expectation maximization with a Bayesian prior accurately and efficiently reconstructs rapidly acquired Ge-68 TX scans for Rb-82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography studies.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of myocardial perfusion 82Rb PET performed with CT- and transmission CT-based attenuation correction.J Nucl Med. 2008 Dec;49(12):1992-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056580. J Nucl Med. 2008. PMID: 19038996
-
Impact of Ge-68/Ga-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET.Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):889-97. doi: 10.1118/1.2437283. Med Phys. 2007. PMID: 17441234
-
Comparison of low-pitch and respiratory-averaged CT protocols for attenuation correction of cardiac PET studies.Med Phys. 2009 May;36(5):1618-23. doi: 10.1118/1.3112362. Med Phys. 2009. PMID: 19544778
-
[Comparison of activity expression between PET using 68Ge-68Ga line source attenuation correction and PET-CT using CT attenuation correction: impact on emission images].Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Jun 20;62(6):832-9. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.62.832. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2006. PMID: 16799411 Japanese.
-
X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.Semin Nucl Med. 2003 Jul;33(3):166-79. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2003.127307. Semin Nucl Med. 2003. PMID: 12931319 Review.
Cited by
-
Regadenoson pharmacologic rubidium-82 PET: a comparison of quantitative perfusion and function to dipyridamole.J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Feb;20(1):76-83. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9636-4. Epub 2012 Nov 28. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23188625
-
Status of cardiovascular PET radiation exposure and strategies for reduction: An Information Statement from the Cardiovascular PET Task Force.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0897-9. Epub 2017 May 16. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28512722
-
Minimizing the radiation dose of CT attenuation correction while improving image quality: The case for innovation.J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Oct;23(5):1080-1085. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0182-8. Epub 2015 Jun 23. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26100578 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources