Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):761-76.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2182.

Biological control and sustainable food production

Affiliations
Review

Biological control and sustainable food production

J S Bale et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The use of biological control for the management of pest insects pre-dates the modern pesticide era. The first major successes in biological control occurred with exotic pests controlled by natural enemy species collected from the country or area of origin of the pest (classical control). Augmentative control has been successfully applied against a range of open-field and greenhouse pests, and conservation biological control schemes have been developed with indigenous predators and parasitoids. The cost-benefit ratio for classical biological control is highly favourable (1:250) and for augmentative control is similar to that of insecticides (1:2-1:5), with much lower development costs. Over the past 120 years, more than 5000 introductions of approximately 2000 non-native control agents have been made against arthropod pests in 196 countries or islands with remarkably few environmental problems. Biological control is a key component of a 'systems approach' to integrated pest management, to counteract insecticide-resistant pests, withdrawal of chemicals and minimize the usage of pesticides. Current studies indicate that genetically modified insect-resistant Bt crops may have no adverse effects on the activity or function of predators or parasitoids used in biological control. The introduction of rational approaches for the environmental risk assessment of non-native control agents is an essential step in the wider application of biological control, but future success is strongly dependent on a greater level of investment in research and development by governments and related organizations that are committed to a reduced reliance on chemical control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albajes, R., Castañé, C., Gabarra, R. & Alomar, O. 2006 Risks of plant damage caused by natural enemies introduced for arthropod biological control. In Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment (eds F. Bigler, D. Babendreier, U. Kuhlmann), pp. 132–144. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
    1. Andov, D. A. 1983 Plant diversity and insect populations: interactions among beans, weeds and insects. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
    1. Babendreier D, Bigler F, Kuhlmann U. Methods used to assess non-target effects of invertebrate biological control agents of arthropod pests. BioControl. 2005;50:821–870. doi:10.1007/s10526-005-3633-3 - DOI
    1. Bellows T.S, Fisher T.W, editors. Handbook of biological control. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 1999.
    1. Bigler F. Mass production of Trichogramma maidis Pint, Et Voeg. and its field application against Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn in Switzerland. J. Appl. Entomol. 1986;101:23–29.

LinkOut - more resources