Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Sep;26(5):521-32.
doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.521.

Lifestyle interventions in the treatment of childhood overweight: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials

Denise E Wilfley  1 , Tiffany L Tibbs, Dorothy J Van Buren, Kelle P Reach, Mark S Walker, Leonard H Epstein
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Lifestyle interventions in the treatment of childhood overweight: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials

Denise E Wilfley et al. Health Psychol. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Context: Evaluating the efficacy of pediatric weight loss treatments is critical.

Objective: This is the first meta-analysis of the efficacy of RCTs comparing pediatric lifestyle interventions to no-treatment or information/education-only controls.

Data sources: Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

Study selection: Fourteen RCTs targetting change in weight status were eligible, yielding 19 effect sizes.

Data extraction: Standardized coding was used to extract information on design, participant characteristics, interventions, and results.

Data synthesis: For trials with no-treatment controls, the mean effect size was 0.75 (k = 9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.98) at end of treatment and 0.60 (k = 4, CI = 0.27-0.94) at follow-up. For trials with information/education-only controls, the mean ES was 0.48 (k = 4, CI = 0.13-0.82) at end of treatment and 0.91 (k = 2, CI = 0.32-1.50) at follow-up. No moderator effects were identified.

Conclusions: Lifestyle interventions for pediatric overweight are efficacious in the short term with some evidence for extended persistence. Future research is required to identify moderators and mediators and to determine the optimal length and intensity of treatment required to produce enduring changes in weight status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of studies into the review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for pediatric overweight.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study-specific and weighted mean effect sizes and confidence intervals, categorized by comparison group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect sizes plotted by time, showing an increasing trend for treatment time points and a decreasing trend for follow-up time points.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. *Aragona J, Cassady J, Drabman RS. Treating overweight children through parental training and contingency contracting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1975;8:269–278. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkham M, Connell J, Stiles WB, Miles JNV, Margison F, Evans C, et al. Dose- effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2006;74(1):160–167. - PubMed
    1. Braet C. Patient characteristics as predictors of weight loss after an overweight treatment for children. Obesity. 2006;14(1):148–155. - PubMed
    1. Braet C, Van Winckel M. Long-term follow-up of a cognitive behavioral treatment program for obese children. Behavior Therapy. 2000;31:55–74.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

Publication types