Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
- PMID: 17846304
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
Abstract
Background: Advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents have dramatically improved results of these procedures. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is uncertain given the lack of prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice. This study represents a "real-world" evaluation of current technology in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.
Methods and results: A total of 1680 patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease were identified. Of these, 1080 patients were treated for 2-vessel disease (196 CABG and 884 PCI) and 600 for 3-vessel disease (505 CABG and 95 PCI). One-year mortality, cerebrovascular events, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target vessel failure, and composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were compared between the CABG and PCI cohorts. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline covariates and reported as hazard ratios. The unadjusted major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rate was reduced with CABG for patients with 2-vessel disease (9.7% CABG versus 21.2% PCI; P<0.001) and 3-vessel disease (10.8% CABG versus 28.4% PCI; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes showed increased major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for patients with 2-vessel (hazard ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.76; P=0.01) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 2.90; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.78; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes for the nondiabetic subpopulation demonstrated equivalent major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for 2-vessel (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.25; P=0.07) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% CI 0.77 to 3.61; P=0.19).
Conclusions: Compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents, CABG resulted in improved major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event in patients with 2- and 3-vessel coronary artery disease, primarily in those with underlying diabetes. Coronary artery bypass surgery may be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Similar articles
-
Surgical revascularization is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with percutaneous stenting in most subgroups of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the Intermountain Heart Registry.Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I226-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681346. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17846308
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary disease. A meta-analysis on 24,268 patients.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Oct;36(4):611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Apr 25. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19394857 Review.
-
Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 2;55(5):432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20117456 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752147. Epub 2008 Aug 25. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18725490
-
Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):466-70; discussion 470. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276497 Review.
Cited by
-
Late Clinical Outcomes of Total Arterial Revascularization or Multiple Arterial Grafting Compared to Conventional Single Arterial with Saphenous Vein Grafting for Coronary Surgery.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):2516. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072516. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048600 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term mortality of coronary artery bypass grafting and bare-metal stenting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;92(6):2132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.061. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 22014747 Free PMC article.
-
The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(5):375-86. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009. PMID: 19876412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: Current state of evidence.Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011 Spring;16(1):16-22. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21523202 Free PMC article.
-
Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0574-z. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25702314 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous