Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2007 Sep;25(3):186-92.
doi: 10.1080/02813430701573943.

Effect of an integrated primary care model on the management of middle-aged and old patients with obstructive lung diseases

Marianne A Meulepas  1 , Johanna E Jacobs, Frank W J M Smeenk, Ivo Smeele, Annelies E M Lucas, Ben J A M Bottema, Richard P T M Grol
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Effect of an integrated primary care model on the management of middle-aged and old patients with obstructive lung diseases

Marianne A Meulepas et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of a primary care model for COPD on process of care and patient outcome.

Design: Controlled study with delayed intervention in control group.

Setting: The GP delegates tasks to a COPD support service (CSS) and a practice nurse. The CSS offers logistic support to the practice through a patient register and recall system for annual history-taking and lung function measurement. It also forms the link with the chest physician for diagnostic and therapeutic advice. The practice nurse's most important tasks are education and counselling.

Subjects: A total of 44 practices (n =22 for intervention and n =22 for control group) and 260 of their patients > or = 40 years with obstructive lung diseases.

Results: Within the intervention group planned visits increased from 16% to 44% and from 19% to 25% in the control condition (difference between groups p =0.014). Annual lung function measurement rose from 17% to 67% in the intervention and from 11% to 18% in the control group (difference between groups p =0.001). Compared with control, more but not statistically significant smokers received periodic advice to quit smoking (p =0.16). At baseline 41% of the intervention group were using their inhalers correctly and this increased to 54% after two years; it decreased in the control group from 47 to 29% (difference between groups p =0.002). The percentage of patients without exacerbation did not change significantly compared with the control condition. The percentage of the intervention group not needing emergency medication rose from 79% to 84% but decreased in the controls from 81 to 76% (difference between groups p =0.08).

Conclusion: Combining different disciplines in one model has a positive effect on compliance with recommendations for monitoring patients, and improves the care process and some patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Actors primary care model COPD.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient flow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. GOLD. Available at: http://www.goldcopd.com.
    1. Buist AS. Guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (review) Respir Med. 2002;96:S11–16. - PubMed
    1. Geijer RMM, Thiadens HA, Smeele IJM, Sachs APE, Bottema BJAM, Van Hensbergen W, et al. NHG-Standaard COPD en Astma bij Volwassenen: Diagnostiek [Dutch College of General Practitioners Guidelines for COPD and Asthma in Adults: Diagnostics] Huisarts Wet. 2001;44:107–17.
    1. Geijer RMM, Van Schayck CP, Van Weel C, Sachs APE, Bottema BJAM, Smeele IJM, et al. NHG-standaard COPD: Behandeling [Dutch College of General Practitioners Guidelines for COPD: Treatment] Huisarts Wet. 2001;44:207–19.
    1. Barr RG, Celli BR, Martinez FJ, Ries AL, Rennard SI, Reilly JJ, Jr, et al. Physician and patient perceptions in COPD: Rhe COPD Resource Network Needs Assessment Survey. Am J Med. 2005;118:1415. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms