Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec 22;3(6):617-9.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0388.

Monogamy on the fast track

Affiliations

Monogamy on the fast track

Elizabeth Adkins-Regan et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Social monogamy has evolved multiple times and is particularly common in birds. It is not well understood why some of these species are continuously and permanently paired while others occasionally 'divorce' (switch partners). Although several hypotheses have been considered, experimental tests are uncommon. Estrildid finches are thought to be permanently paired because being short-lived opportunistic breeders, they cannot afford the time to form a new pair relationship. Here it is shown through a controlled experimental manipulation that zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) allowed to remain with their partners to breed again are faster to initiate a clutch (by approx. 3 days) than birds separated from their mates that have to re-pair, supporting the hypothesis that continuous pairing speeds up initiation of reproduction, a benefit of long-term monogamy in a small, short-lived, gregarious species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clutch initiation latencies (untransformed, means±s.e.m.) before (phase 1) and after (phase 2) assignment to groups. Day 0 was the day the pairs were moved to pair cages for daily nest checks (latencies from the beginning of the aviary period would be 5 days longer). The group×phase interaction was significant (means±s.e.m.; p=0.018).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distributions of phase 2 clutch initiation latencies (untransformed) for (a) Same Partner and (b) Different Partner pairs. Arrows indicate means. Latencies in (a) were significantly shorter (p=0.0025).

References

    1. Birkhead T.R, Burke T, Zann R, Hunter F.M, Krupa A.P. Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1990;27:315–324. doi:10.1007/BF00164002 - DOI
    1. Black J.M, editor. Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 1996.
    1. Delesalle V.A. Division of parental care and reproductive success in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) Behav. Proc. 1986;12:1–22. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(86)90066-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dhondt A.A. Changing mates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002;17:55–56. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02407-7 - DOI
    1. Dubois F, Cézilly F. Breeding success and mate retention in birds: a meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2002;52:357–364. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0521-z - DOI

Publication types