Declining rates in male circumcision amidst increasing evidence of its public health benefit
- PMID: 17848992
- PMCID: PMC1955830
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000861
Declining rates in male circumcision amidst increasing evidence of its public health benefit
Abstract
Background: Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated the benefits of male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Studies have also shown that male circumcision is cost-effective and reduces the risk for certain ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The epidemiology of male circumcision in the United States is poorly studied and most prior reports were limited by self-reported measures. The study objective was to describe male circumcision trends among men attending the San Francisco municipal STD clinic, and to correlate the findings with HIV, syphilis and sexual orientation.
Methods and findings: A cross sectional study was performed by reviewing all electronic records of males attending the San Francisco municipal STD clinic between 1996 and 2005. The prevalence of circumcision over time and by subpopulation such as race/ethnicity and sexual orientation were measured. The findings were further correlated with the presence of syphilis and HIV infection. Circumcision status was determined by physical examination and disease status by clinical evaluation with laboratory confirmation. Among 58,598 male patients, 32,613 (55.7%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 55.2-56.1) were circumcised. Male circumcision varied significantly by decade of birth (increasing between 1920 and 1950 and declining overall since the 1960's), race/ethnicity (Black: 62.2%, 95% CI 61.2-63.2, White: 60.0%, 95% CI 59.46-60.5, Asian Pacific Islander: 48.2%, 46.9-49.5 95% CI, and Hispanic: 42.2%, 95% CI 41.3-43.1), and sexual orientation (gay/bisexual: 73.0%, 95% CI 72.6-73.4; heterosexual: 66.0%, 65.5-66.5). Male circumcision may have been modestly protective against syphilis in HIV-uninfected heterosexual men (PR 0.92, 95% C.I. 0.83-1.02, P = 0.06).
Conclusions: Male circumcision was common among men seeking STD services in San Francisco but has declined substantially in recent decades. Male circumcision rates differed by race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. Given recent studies suggesting the public health benefits of male circumcision, a reconsideration of national male circumcision policy is needed to respond to current trends.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
HIV-1 prevalence and risk factors among sexually transmitted disease clinic attenders in Trinidad.AIDS. 1995 Apr;9(4):389-94. AIDS. 1995. PMID: 7794544
-
Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10-24 years - United States, 2002-2007.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009 Jul 17;58(6):1-58. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009. PMID: 19609250
-
The influence of male circumcision for HIV prevention on sexual behaviour among traditionally circumcised men in Cape Town, South Africa.Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Nov;22(11):674-9. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.011006. Int J STD AIDS. 2011. PMID: 22096055
-
The association between lack of male circumcision and risk for HIV infection: a review of the epidemiological data.Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Jul-Aug;21(4):201-10. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199407000-00004. Sex Transm Dis. 1994. PMID: 7974070 Review.
-
Male circumcision to reduce sexual transmission of HIV.Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 Jul;5(4):344-9. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32833a46d3. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010. PMID: 20543611 Review.
Cited by
-
Infant male circumcision: healthcare provider knowledge and associated factors.PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0115891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115891. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25635664 Free PMC article.
-
Circumcision to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data.Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e436-e447. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30567-9. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 30879508 Free PMC article.
-
Exposé of misleading claims that male circumcision will increase HIV infections in Africa.J Public Health Afr. 2011 Sep 5;2(2):e28. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2011.e28. eCollection 2011 Sep 5. J Public Health Afr. 2011. PMID: 28299069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review: a critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision for HIV prevention in developed countries.AIDS Care. 2012;24(12):1565-75. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.661836. Epub 2012 Mar 28. AIDS Care. 2012. PMID: 22452415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Willingness of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States to be circumcised as adults to reduce the risk of HIV infection.PLoS One. 2008 Jul 16;3(7):e2731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002731. PLoS One. 2008. PMID: 18628946 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Van Howe RS, Svoboda JS, Hodges FM. HIV infection and circumcision: cutting through the hyperbole. J R Soc Health. 2005;125:259–265. - PubMed
-
- Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA. 1997;277:1052–1057. - PubMed
-
- Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Male circumcision practice patterns in the United States. Pediatrics. 1998;101:E5. - PubMed
-
- Fayre Milos M. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection. Lancet. 2004;363:1998. - PubMed
-
- Fink AJ. A possible explanation for heterosexual male infection with AIDS. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1167. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials