Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals
- PMID: 17850521
- PMCID: PMC2254571
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00720.x
Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals
Abstract
Objective: A limitation of studies comparing outcomes of Veterans Affairs (VA) and private sector hospitals is uncertainty about the methods of accounting for risk factors in VA populations. This study estimates whether use of VA services is a marker for increased risk by comparing outcomes of VA users and other patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.
Data sources: Males 67 years and older undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG; n=687,936) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; n=664,124) during 1996-2002 were identified from Medicare administrative data. Patients using VA services during the 2 years preceding the Medicare admission were identified using VA administrative files.
Study design: Thirty-, 90-, and 365-day mortality were compared in patients who did and did not use VA services, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors using generalized estimating equations and propensity score analysis.
Results: Adjusted mortality after CABG was higher (p<.001) in VA users compared with nonusers at 30, 90, and 365 days: odds ratio (OR)=1.07 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.11), 1.07 (95 percent CI, 1.04-1.10), and 1.09 (95 percent CI, 1.06-1.12), respectively. For PCI, mortality at 30 and 90 days was similar (p>.05) for VA users and nonusers, but was higher at 365 days (OR=1.09; 95 percent CI, 1.06-1.12). The increased risk of death in VA users was limited to patients with service-connected disabilities or low incomes. Odds of death for VA users were slightly lower using samples matched by propensity scores.
Conclusions: A small difference in risk-adjusted outcomes for VA users and nonusers undergoing revascularization in private sector hospitals was found. This difference reflects unmeasured severity in VA users undergoing revascularization in private sector hospitals.
References
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(15):1128–37. - PubMed
-
- Brown D. 2003. Study Faults VA on Heart Care; Agency Vows Bid to Improve System.”Washington Post Page A7. 4-12-2003.
-
- Department of Veterans Affairs. 1987. A Report on the Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans Affairs: The Phase I Report.” R&D No. IL 10-87-7. 5-8-1987b. Washington, DC: Administrator of Veterans Affairs.
-
- Department of Veterans Affairs. 1989. A Report on the Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans Affairs: The Phase II Report.” Veterans Health Services Research Administration. R&D No. IL 10-87-8. 4-12-1989a. Washington, DC: Administrator of Veterans Affairs (findings also found in Stremple, J. H., D. S. Bross, C. L. Davis, and D. O. McDonald. 1993. “Comparison of Postoperative Mortality in VA and Private Hospitals.”Annals of Surgery 272–85.).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
