Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Oct;42(5):1999-2021.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00706.x.

Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the patient safety climate in healthcare organizations survey

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the patient safety climate in healthcare organizations survey

Sara Singer et al. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development of an instrument for assessing workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture and to assess its reliability and validity.

Data sources/study setting: Primary data collected between March 2004 and May 2005. Personnel from 105 U.S. hospitals completed a 38-item paper and pencil survey. We received 21,496 completed questionnaires, representing a 51 percent response rate.

Study design: Based on review of existing safety climate surveys, we developed a list of key topics pertinent to maintaining a culture of safety in high-reliability organizations. We developed a draft questionnaire to address these topics and pilot tested it in four preliminary studies of hospital personnel. We modified the questionnaire based on experience and respondent feedback, and distributed the revised version to 42,249 hospital workers.

Data collection: We randomly divided respondents into derivation and validation samples. We applied exploratory factor analysis to responses in the derivation sample. We used those results to create scales in the validation sample, which we subjected to multitrait analysis (MTA).

Principal findings: We identified nine constructs, three organizational factors, two unit factors, three individual factors, and one additional factor. Constructs demonstrated substantial convergent and discriminant validity in the MTA. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.50 to 0.89.

Conclusions: It is possible to measure key salient features of hospital safety climate using a valid and reliable 38-item survey and appropriate hospital sample sizes. This instrument may be used in further studies to better understand the impact of safety climate on patient safety outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical Model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Augustine C, Weick K, Bagian J, Lee C. Predispositions towards a Culture of Safety in a Large Multi-facility Health System. In: Mirage Rancho., editor. Enhancing Patient Safety and Reducing Errors in Health Care Conference. Chicago: National Patient Safety Foundation; 1998. pp. 138–41. CA, pp.
    1. Campbell D, Fiske D. Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin. 1959;56:81–105. - PubMed
    1. Cattell RB. The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor-Analysis. In: Cattell R, editor. Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1966. pp. 174–243.
    1. Ciavarelli A, Figlock R, Sengupta K. Organizational Factors in Aviation Accidents. Naval Postgraduate School Res. 1999;9:4–5. 40–3.
    1. Colla J, Bracken A, Kinney L, Weeks W. Measuring Patient Safety Climate: A Review of Surveys. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2005;14(5):364–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types