Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;61(8):1239-49.
doi: 10.1080/17470210701467953.

Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading

Affiliations

Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading

Denis Drieghe et al. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Contrasting predictions of serial and parallel views on the processing of foveal and parafoveal information during reading were tested. A high-frequency adjective (young) was followed by either a high-frequency word(n) (child) or a low-frequency word(n) (tenor), which in turn was followed by either a correct (performing) or an orthographic illegal word(n+1) (pxvforming) as a parafoveal preview. A limited parafoveal-on-foveal effect was observed: There were inflated fixation times on word(n) when the preview of word(n+1) was orthographically illegal. However, this parafoveal-on-foveal effect was (a) independent of the frequency of word(n), (b) restricted to those instances when the eyes were very close to word(n+1), and (c) associated with relatively long prior saccades. These observations are all compatible with a mislocated fixation account in which parafoveal-on-foveal effects result from saccadic undershoots of word(n+1) and with a serial model of eye movement control during reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of the average single-fixation duration on wordn as a function of the preview of wordn+1. The letter position 0 is the blank space in front of wordn.

References

    1. Brysbaert M, Drieghe D, Vitu F. Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In: Underwood G, editor. Cognitive processes in eye guidance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 53–78.
    1. Drieghe D, Brysbaert M, Desmet T. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: Does an extra space make a difference? Vision Research. 2005a;45:1693–1706. - PubMed
    1. Drieghe D, Rayner K, Pollatsek A. Word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2005b;31:954–969. - PubMed
    1. Engbert R, Nuthmann A, Kliegl R. An iterative algorithm for the estimation of the distribution of mislocated fixations during reading. In: Van Gompel RPG, Fischer MF, Murray WS, Hill RL, editors. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 319–337.
    1. Engbert R, Nuthmann A, Richter E, Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review. 2005;112:777–813. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources