Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep 13:7:144.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-144.

An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice [LP0775514]

Affiliations

An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice [LP0775514]

Jeffrey Braithwaite et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Inter-professional learning (IPL) and inter-professional practice (IPP) are thought to be critical determinants of effective care, improved quality and safety and enhanced provider morale, yet few empirical studies have demonstrated this. Whole-of-system research is even less prevalent. We aim to provide a four year, multi-method, multi-collaborator action research program of IPL and IPP in defined, bounded health and education systems located in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The project is funded by the Australian Research Council under its industry Linkage Program.

Methods/design: The program of research will examine in four inter-related, prospective studies, progress with IPL and IPP across tertiary education providers, professional education, regulatory and registration bodies, the ACT health system's streams of care activities and teams, units and wards of the provider facilities of the ACT health system. One key focus will be on push-pull mechanisms, ie, how the education sector creates student-enabled IPP and the health sector demands IPL-oriented practitioners. The studies will examine four research aims and meet 20 research project objectives in a comprehensive evaluation of ongoing progress with IPL and IPP.

Discussion: IPP and IPL are said to be cornerstones of health system reforms. We will measure progress across an entire health system and the clinical and professional education systems that feed into it. The value of multi-methods, partnership research and a bi-directional push-pull model of IPL and IPP will be tested. Widespread dissemination of results to practitioners, policymakers, managers and researchers will be a key project goal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four areas of focus for the IPL project.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Research approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detailed research plan and process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Øvretveit J. Action evaluation of health programmes and changes: a handbook for a user-focused approach. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
    1. Kvarnström S, Cedersund E. Discursive patterns in multiprofessional healthcare teams. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:244–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03719.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stout R, Salas E. The role of trainee knowledge structures in aviation team environments. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1997;7:235–250. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0703_4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coupland C, Blyton P, Bacon N. A longitudinal study of the influence of shop floor work teams on expressions of 'us' and 'them'. Hum Relat. 2005;58:1055–1081. doi: 10.1177/0018726705058503. - DOI
    1. McKee T. Building successful teams in the midst of transition. J Qual Part. 2003;26:43.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources