Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;5(9):881-90.
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0055.

Breast cancer molecular signatures as determined by SAGE: correlation with lymph node status

Affiliations

Breast cancer molecular signatures as determined by SAGE: correlation with lymph node status

Martín C Abba et al. Mol Cancer Res. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Global gene expression measured by DNA microarray platforms have been extensively used to classify breast carcinomas correlating with clinical characteristics, including outcome. We generated a breast cancer Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) high-resolution database of approximately 2.7 million tags to perform unsupervised statistical analyses to obtain the molecular classification of breast-invasive ductal carcinomas in correlation with clinicopathologic features. Unsupervised statistical analysis by means of a random forest approach identified two main clusters of breast carcinomas, which differed in their lymph node status (P=0.01); this suggested that lymph node status leads to globally distinct expression profiles. A total of 245 (55 up-modulated and 190 down-modulated) transcripts were differentially expressed between lymph node (+) and lymph node (-) primary breast tumors (fold change, >or=2; P<0.05). Various lymph node (+) up-modulated transcripts were validated in independent sets of human breast tumors by means of real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). We validated significant overexpression of transcripts for HOXC10 (P=0.001), TPD52L1 (P=0.007), ZFP36L1 (P=0.011), PLINP1 (P=0.013), DCTN3 (P=0.025), DEK (P=0.031), and CSNK1D (P=0.04) in lymph node (+) breast carcinomas. Moreover, the DCTN3 (P=0.022) and RHBDD2 (P=0.002) transcripts were confirmed to be overexpressed in tumors that recurred within 6 years of follow-up by real-time RT-PCR. In addition, meta-analysis was used to compare SAGE data associated with lymph node (+) status with publicly available breast cancer DNA microarray data sets. We have generated evidence indicating that the pattern of gene expression in primary breast cancers at the time of surgical removal could discriminate those tumors with lymph node metastatic involvement using SAGE to identify specific transcripts that behave as predictors of recurrence as well.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
SAGE profiles of 27 primary invasive breast carcinomas. A. The SAGE profiles of 27 breast carcinomas are visualized in a two-dimensional multidimensional scaling plot where each dot represents one sample and the relative distances between samples are correlated with their RF dissimilarities. Breast carcinomas are colored by their RF clustering memberships: cluster A (fuchsia) composed by 78% of lymph node (+) carcinomas and cluster B (blue) composed of 87% of lymph node (−) breast carcinomas. B. Hierarchical clustering of 245 differentially expressed genes (55 up-modulated transcripts and 190 down-modulated transcripts) according to patient’s lymph node status based on pathologic diagnosis. Color scale at the bottom of the picture is used to represent expression level: low expression is represented by green, and high expression is represented by red. Results of meta-analysis (from publicly available gene expression microarray data sets) of 55 up-modulated (C) and 55 down-modulated transcripts (D) identified by SAGE. Red or green boxes, represent statistically significant agreement between our study and previously published studies not only on lymph node status, but also in association with other progression parameters such as metastasis or relapse. Red, statistically significant P values (P < 0.05) associated with gene overexpression in lymph node (+), metastasis, and relapse (DFS); green, statistically significant down-modulated expression. Gray boxes, Unavailable data.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Validation assays of SAGE expression profiles in an independent set of primary invasive breast carcinomas (n = 40). A. Real-time RT-PCR of seven up-modulated transcripts (HOXC10, TPD52L1, ZFP36L1, PLINP1, DCTN3, DEK, CSNK1D, RHBDD2) in LN(+) carcinomas. B. Real-time RT-PCR of two up-modulated transcripts (DCTN3, RHBDD2) in recurrent breast carcinomas. Mean ± 2 SE based on log2 transformation of real-time RT-PCR values of the assayed gene relative to 18S rRNA used as normalizing control.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Hierarchical clustering of primary breast carcinomas based on real-time RT-PCR validation data. A. Cluster showing nodes in the basis of lymph node distribution (P = 0.0001). B. Cluster showing nodes in the basis of recurrence status distribution (P = 0.001).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
DCTN3 immunohistochemical staining in normal (adjacent tumor), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDCA), and metastatic breast samples.

References

    1. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10869–10874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van’t Veer LJ, Dai Hongyue, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–536. - PubMed
    1. Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009. - PubMed
    1. Ahr A, Karn T, Solbach C, et al. Identification of high risk breast-cancer patients by gene expression profiling. Lancet. 2002;359:131–132. - PubMed
    1. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8418–8423. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types