Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
- PMID: 17855670
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa064247
Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism is treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by a vitamin K antagonist. We investigated the potential use of idraparinux, a long-acting inhibitor of activated factor X, as a substitute for standard therapy.
Methods: We conducted two randomized, open-label noninferiority trials involving 2904 patients with deep-vein thrombosis and 2215 patients with pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux versus standard therapy. Patients received either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg once weekly) or a heparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for either 3 or 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (nonfatal or fatal).
Results: In the study of patients with deep venous thrombosis, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 2.9% in the idraparinux group as compared with 3.0% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.50), a result that satisfied the prespecified noninferiority requirement. At 6 months, the hazard ratio for idraparinux was 1.01. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding at day 92 were 4.5% in the idraparinux group and 7.0% in the standard-therapy group (P=0.004). At 6 months, bleeding rates were similar. In the study of patients with pulmonary embolism, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 3.4% in the idraparinux group and 1.6% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.78), a finding that did not meet the noninferiority requirement.
Conclusions: In patients with deep venous thrombosis, once-weekly subcutaneous idraparinux for 3 or 6 months had an efficacy similar to that of heparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. However, in patients with pulmonary embolism, idraparinux was less efficacious than standard therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093 [ClinicalTrials.gov] and NCT00062803 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Idraparinux was noninferior to standard therapy for deep venous thrombosis but inferior for pulmonary embolism.ACP J Club. 2008 Jan-Feb;148(1):19-20. ACP J Club. 2008. PMID: 18171006 No abstract available.
-
Commentary. Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with idraparinux.Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2008 Sep;20(3):312-4. doi: 10.1177/1531003508319703. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2008. PMID: 18930944 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Enoxaparin plus idrabiotaparinux was noninferior to enoxaparin plus warfarin for recurrent VTE in acute PE.Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):JC5-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-02004. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22586022 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical