Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 17869635
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61445-7
Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2004
Abstract
Background: After hip replacement surgery, prophylaxis following discharge from hospital is recommended to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism. Our aim was to assess the oral, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate for such prophylaxis.
Methods: In this double-blind study, we randomised 3494 patients undergoing total hip replacement to treatment for 28-35 days with dabigatran etexilate 220 mg (n=1157) or 150 mg (1174) once daily, starting with a half-dose 1-4 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (1162), starting the evening before surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of total venous thromboembolism (venographic or symptomatic) and death from all causes during treatment. On the basis of the absolute difference in rates of venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin versus placebo, the non-inferiority margin for the difference in rates of thromboembolism was defined as 7.7%. Efficacy analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00168818.
Findings: Median treatment duration was 33 days. 880 patients in the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group, 874 in the dabigatran etexilate 150 mg group, and 897 in the enoxaparin group were available for the primary efficacy outcome analysis; the main reasons for exclusion in all three groups were the lack of adequate venographic data. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 60 (6.7%) of 897 individuals in the enoxaparin group versus 53 (6.0%) of 880 patients in the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group (absolute difference -0.7%, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.6%) and 75 (8.6%) of 874 people in the 150 mg group (1.9%, -0.6 to 4.4%). Both doses were thus non-inferior to enoxaparin. There was no significant difference in major bleeding rates with either dose of dabigatran etexilate compared with enoxaparin (p=0.44 for 220 mg, p=0.60 for 150 mg). The frequency of increases in liver enzyme concentrations and of acute coronary events during the study did not differ significantly between the groups.
Interpretation: Oral dabigatran etexilate was as effective as enoxaparin in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement surgery, with a similar safety profile.
Comment in
-
Trials of venous thromboembolism prevention.Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):915-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61425-1. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17869620 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran versus enoxaparin after total hip replacement.Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2002; author reply 2003-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61858-3. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 18083398 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran versus enoxaparin after total hip replacement.Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2002-3; author reply 2003-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61859-5. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 18083399 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II*). A randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.Thromb Haemost. 2011 Apr;105(4):721-9. doi: 10.1160/TH10-10-0679. Epub 2011 Jan 12. Thromb Haemost. 2011. PMID: 21225098 Clinical Trial.
-
Dabigatran: new drug. Continue to use heparin, a better-known option.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):97-9. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637411
-
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;101(1):77-85. Thromb Haemost. 2009. PMID: 19132192
-
Dabigatran etexilate: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases.Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Nov;28(11):1354-73. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.11.1354. Pharmacotherapy. 2008. PMID: 18956996 Review.
-
Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery.Drugs. 2012 May 7;72(7):963-86. doi: 10.2165/11209080-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22564134 Review.
Cited by
-
Measurement of non-VKA oral anticoagulants versus classic ones: the appropriate use of hemostasis assays.Thromb J. 2014 Nov 4;12:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-12-24. eCollection 2014. Thromb J. 2014. PMID: 25750588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging antithrombotic agents for thromboprophylaxis, clinical potential and patient considerations.J Blood Med. 2010;1:123-30. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S6543. Epub 2010 Jul 5. J Blood Med. 2010. PMID: 22282691 Free PMC article.
-
Boehringer launches first direct thrombin inhibitor: dabigatran (Pradaxa).Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010 May-Jun;21(3):173-4. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010. PMID: 20532462 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Bleeding complications due to anticoagulatoric therapy].Internist (Berl). 2009 Dec;50(12):1369-80. doi: 10.1007/s00108-009-2520-x. Internist (Berl). 2009. PMID: 19924389 German.
-
The proof for new oral anticoagulants: clinical trial evidence.Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Jul;2(1-2):7-14. doi: 10.1007/s12570-011-0063-9. Epub 2011 May 19. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2011. PMID: 21892362 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical