Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium
- PMID: 17873257
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07307272
Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium
Abstract
This article reports on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Symposium held in 2006 at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The symposium featured a debate regarding the proposition that "decision aids are the best way to improve clinical decision making.'' The formal debate addressed the theoretical problem of the appropriate gold standard for an improved decision, efficacy of decision aids, and prospects for implementation. Audience comments and questions focused on both theory and practice: the often unacknowledged roots of decision aids in expected utility theory and the practical problems of limited patient decision aid implementation in health care. The participants' vote on the proposition was approximately half for and half against.
Similar articles
-
A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines.Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.038. Epub 2008 Sep 2. Patient Educ Couns. 2008. PMID: 18768285
-
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5. Eur J Health Econ. 2008. PMID: 18987905
-
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008. PMID: 19034813 German.
-
Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids.Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.010. Patient Educ Couns. 2005. PMID: 15893205 Review. No abstract available.
-
The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2010. PMID: 20171821 Review.
Cited by
-
A theory-based decision aid for patients with cancer: results of feasibility and acceptability testing of DecisionKEYS for cancer.Support Care Cancer. 2013 Mar;21(3):889-99. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1603-8. Epub 2012 Oct 11. Support Care Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23052911 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the effects on information use by older versus younger women of modality and narration style in a hospital report card.Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):567-578. doi: 10.1111/hex.13389. Epub 2021 Dec 24. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 34953006 Free PMC article.
-
Empathy: necessary for effective pain management?Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2008 Apr;12(2):108-12. doi: 10.1007/s11916-008-0021-6. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2008. PMID: 18474190 Review.
-
A qualitative study on patients' and their support persons' preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06632-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34187476 Free PMC article.
-
Wilfully out of sight? A literature review on the effectiveness of cancer-related decision aids and implementation strategies.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Mar 15;16:36. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0273-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016. PMID: 26979236 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources