Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;19(4):511-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0466-1. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapy

Affiliations

Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapy

F J A Penning-van Beest et al. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Among 8,822 new female bisphosphonate users, non-compliant bisphosphonate use was associated with a 45% increased risk of osteoporotic fracture compared to compliant use (MPR >or=80%). Classifying compliance into five categories, fracture risk gradually increased with poorer compliance. These results emphasize the importance of treatment compliance in obtaining maximal treatment benefit.

Introduction: Bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis and reduce fracture risk. Low compliance is frequent and will limit treatment benefit.

Methods: New female users of alendronate or risedronate between 1999-2004, aged >or=45 years were identified from PHARMO-RLS, including drug-dispensing and hospitalization data of >or= 2 million residents of the Netherlands. Patients were followed until first hospitalisation for an osteoporotic fracture, death, or end of study period. Compliance with bisphosphonates during follow-up was measured over 90-day intervals using Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). The association between compliance and fracture risk was analyzed using time-dependent Cox-regression.

Results: The study cohort included 8,822 new female bisphosphonate users, contributing in total 22,484 person-years of follow-up. During follow-up, 176 osteoporotic fractures occurred (excluding the first six months). Non-compliant bisphosphonate use was associated with a 45% increased fracture risk compared to compliant use (MPR >or= 80%). Classifying compliance into five categories, fracture risk gradually increased with poorer compliance (p-value <0.05 for trend). A MPR <20% was associated with an 80% increased fracture risk compared to a MPR >or= 90%.

Conclusions: These results show a statistically significant association between level of compliance with bisphosphonates and level of fracture risk, emphasizing the importance of treatment compliance in obtaining maximal treatment benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Compliance with bisphosphonates, classified in five MPR categories, after six months, one year, two years and three years of follow-up. MPR: medication possession ratio
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The relationship between compliance with bisphosphonates, classified in five MPR categories, and fracture risk more than half a year after starting treatment. HRs are adjusted for age and history of fracture and are compared to a MPR ≥90%. MPR: medication possession ratio, HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.285.6.785', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11176917', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11176917/'}]}
    2. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12049882', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12049882/'}]}
    2. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1517/14656566.1.2.225', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.1.2.225'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11249544', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11249544/'}]}
    2. McClung MR (2000) Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis: recent clinical experience. Expert Opin Pharmacother 1:225–238 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJMoa030897', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa030897'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15028823', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15028823/'}]}
    2. Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, et al. (2004) Ten years’ experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 350:1189–1199 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1185/030079906X132370', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906x132370'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16968579', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16968579/'}]}
    2. van den Boogaard CHA, Breekveldt- Postma NS, Borggreve SE, et al.(2006) Persistent bisphosphonate use and the risk of osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice: a database analysis study. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1757–1764 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances