Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;152(6):930-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707451. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity and gastric safety of acemetacin

Affiliations

Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity and gastric safety of acemetacin

A E Chávez-Piña et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Acemetacin is regarded as a pro-drug of indomethacin and induces significantly less gastric damage but the reasons for this greater gastric safety of acemetacin are unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of acemetacin have been attributed, at least in part, to its hepatic biotransformation to indomethacin. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acemetacin and indomethacin in an in vivo model of acute inflammation and to examine the importance of biotransformation of acemetacin (to indomethacin) to its anti-inflammatory actions.

Experimental approach: The zymosan airpouch model was used in rats. Indomethacin or acemetacin (2.7-83.8 micromol kg(-1)) were administered orally or directly into the pouch. Leukocyte infiltration, prostaglandin (PG) E(2) and leukotriene (LT) B(4) levels in exudates, and whole blood thromboxane (TX) B(2) synthesis were measured.

Key results: Acemetacin was rapidly converted to indomethacin after its administration. Both acemetacin and indomethacin elicited comparable, dose-dependent reductions of leukocyte infiltration and of PGE(2) and TXB(2) synthesis. However, indomethacin induced more gastric damage than acemetacin and elevated LTB(4) production in the airpouch.

Conclusions and implications: The similar effects of acemetacin and indomethacin on leukocyte infiltration and PG synthesis are consistent with rapid biotransformation of acemetacin to indomethacin. Some of this biotransformation may occur extra-hepatically, for instance in inflammatory exudates. Acemetacin probably exerts actions independent of conversion to indomethacin, given the different effects of these two drugs on LTB(4) production. Such differences may contribute to the relative gastric safety of acemetacin compared to indomethacin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Leukocyte infiltration, PGE2 and LTB4 after zymosan injection into the airpouch. Leukocyte infiltration is expressed as a percentage of the maximal effect, which occurred at 6 h after zymosan administration. Five rats per group. LTB4, leukotriene B4; PGE2, prostaglandin E2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of leukocyte infiltration in rat airpouch exudate following a single oral or local administration of indomethacin or acemetacin. Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05 vs vehicle; five rats per group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cyclooxygenase-1 activity, assayed as TXB2 levels, in rat whole blood following a single oral or local (into airpouch) dose of indomethacin or acemetacin. Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. P<0.05 vs vehicle, as indicated by bar; five rats per group. TXB2, thromboxane B2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cyclooxygenase-2 activity, assayed as PGE2 levels, following a single oral or local (into airpouch) dose of indomethacin or acemetacin. Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Bar shows P<0.05 vs corresponding indomethacin group; five rats per group. PGE2, prostaglandin E2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
LTB4 levels in rat airpouch exudates following a single oral or local (into airpouch) administration of indomethacin or acemetacin. Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05 vs vehicle; five rats per group. LTB4, leukotriene B4.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Plasma acemetacin (top panel) and indomethacin (bottom panel) concentrations following a single oral or subcutaneous dose of acemetacin (83.8 μmol kg−1). Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Eight rats per group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Gastric damage score 3 h after oral administration of indomethacin or acemetacin. Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05 vs corresponding dose of indomethacin; five rats per group.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Inhibition of whole-blood thromboxane B2 synthesis in vitro by indomethacin and acemetacin. *P<0.05 vs the group that did not receive either drug; five rats per group).

References

    1. Asako H, Kubes P, Wallace J, Gaginella T, Wolf RE, Granger DN. Indomethacin-induced leukocyte adhesion in mesenteric venules: role of lipoxygenase products. Am J Physiol. 1992a;262:G903–G908. - PubMed
    1. Asako H, Kubes P, Wallace J, Wolf RE, Granger DN. Modulation of leukocyte adhesion in rat mesenteric venules by aspirin and salicylate. Gastroenterology. 1992b;103:146–152. - PubMed
    1. Boltze K, Brendler O, Jacobi H, Optiz W, Raddatz S, Seidel PR, et al. Chemical structure and anti-inflammatory activity in the group of substituted indole-3 acetic acids. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res. 1980;30:1314–1325. - PubMed
    1. Bori-Segura G, Torres A, Herrera LE, Olguín J. Efficacy and tolerability of acemetacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in Mexican patients: result of the ETAPAM study. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2002;45:104–107. - PubMed
    1. Chou CT, Tsai YY. A double-blind, randomized, controlled parallel group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of acemetacin for the management of osteoarthritis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2002;22:1–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms