Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep-Oct;122(5):657-63.
doi: 10.1177/003335490712200513.

Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations

Tryfon Beazoglou  1 , Stephen Eklund, Dennis Heffley, Jonathan Meiers, L Jackson Brown, Howard Bailit
Affiliations

Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations

Tryfon Beazoglou et al. Public Health Rep. 2007 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This article estimates the financial impact of a ban on amalgam restorations for selected population groups: the entire population, children, and children and women of childbearing age.

Methods: Using claim and enrollment data from Delta Dental of Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana and the American Dental Association Survey of Dental Services Rendered, we estimated the per capita use and annual rate of change in amalgam restorations for each age, gender, and socioeconomic subgroup. We used population projections to obtain national estimates of amalgam use, and the dental component of the Consumer Price Index to estimate the annual rate of change in fees. We then calculated the number of dental amalgams affected by the regulation, and the fees for each of the years 2005 to 2020.

Results: If amalgam restorations are banned for the entire population, the average price of restorations before 2005 and after the ban would increase $52 from $278 to $330, and total expenditures for restorations would increase from $46.2 billion to $49.7 billion. As the price of restorations increases, there would be 15,444,021 fewer restorations inserted per year. The estimated first-year impact of banning dental amalgams in the entire population is an increase in expenditures of $8.2 billion.

Conclusions: An amalgam ban would have a substantial short- and long-term impact on increasing expenditures for dental care, decreasing utilization, and increasing untreated disease. Based on the available evidence, we believe that state legislatures should seriously consider these effects when contemplating possible restrictions on the use of amalgam restorations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mackert JR, Jr., Berglund A. Mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: absorbed dose and the potential for adverse health effects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8:410–36. - PubMed
    1. Risher JF. Concise international chemical assessment document 50: elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Dye BA, Schober SE, Dillon CF, Jones RL, Fryar C, McDowell M, et al. Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16-49 years: United States, 1999–2000. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:368–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public Health Service (US) Dental amalgam: a scientific review and recommended public health service strategy for research, education and regulation. 1993. Jan, [cited 2005 May 10]. Available from: URL: http://www.health.gov/environment/amalgam1/ct.htm.
    1. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US) CDRH consumer information. 2002 consumer update: dental amalgams. [cited 2006 Apr 19]. Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html.

Publication types