Screening
- PMID: 17877477
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00179.x
Screening
Abstract
Screening is the only practical approach for improving the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, as early detection increases the application of curative treatments. A conference of experts from Japan, USA, and Europe (Barcelona 2005) advised surveillance every six months for patients with chronic liver disease at increased risk of HCC with abdominal US. Whether this approach benefits HCC patients in terms of survival is still uncertain, since available data are retrospective and biased by lead-time factors in the calculation of patient survival. Only one randomized controlled study in China showed the benefit of surveillance for HCC; however, in a population-based setting. Today, clinic-based, randomized studies are unfeasible for ethical reasons. In a cohort of 447 Italian patients with compensated cirrhosis, we compared the survival of HCC patients identified along three consecutive quinquennia of surveillance. HCC developed in 112 patients (3.4% per year) and was the prime cause of death. Forty-six patients (41%) had a single tumor with mean sizes of 3.7, 3.0, and 2.2 cm in the three quinquennia (first vs third, P = 0.0147; second vs third, P = 0.02) and 38(44%) underwent radical therapies. Mortality rates in HCC patients fell from 45% in the first quinquennium to 10% in the third (P = 0.0009), in parallel with a reduction in mortality of treated patients (34, 28, and 5%) (first vs third, P = 0.0024). Cirrhotic patients developing HCC during the last five years of surveillance survived longer than previously, as a consequence of improved management of the tumor and complications of cirrhosis. It remains controversial whether HCC screening is cost-effective, i.e. whether the cost of detection, confirmatory studies, and treatment are outbalanced by the number of life-years gained. In a retrospective study of Italian patients with cirrhosis, there was an incremental cost-efficacy ratio of surveillance vs no surveillance to be $USD 112 993 per liver-year saved. The cost of surveillance was increased by surgery applied to 15 patients with HCC detected during surveillance.
Similar articles
-
Increased survival of cirrhotic patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma detected during surveillance.Gastroenterology. 2004 Apr;126(4):1005-14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.049. Gastroenterology. 2004. PMID: 15057740
-
Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis.Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):251-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.2.251. Gut. 2001. PMID: 11156649 Free PMC article.
-
Compliance With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Guidelines Associated With Increased Lead-Time Adjusted Survival of Patients With Compensated Viral Cirrhosis: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):431-442.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 3. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 29729258
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in the 21st century: Saving lives or causing harm?Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;25(3):264-269. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2019.1001. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30827081 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1001-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27938779 Review.
Cited by
-
Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: when and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study.BMC Cancer. 2009 Jan 27;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-33. BMC Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19171074 Free PMC article.
-
Plasma osteopontin is a biomarker for the severity of alcoholic liver cirrhosis, not for hepatocellular carcinoma screening.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 30;15:73. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0307-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26122937 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources