Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?
- PMID: 17877834
- PMCID: PMC2082018
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-10
Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?
Abstract
Background: HIV prevention research has been fraught with ethical concerns since its inception. These concerns were highlighted during HIV vaccine research and have been elaborated in microbicide research. A host of unique ethical concerns pervade the microbicide research process from trial design to post-trial microbicide availability. Given the urgency of research and development in the face of the devastating HIV pandemic, these ethical concerns represent an enormous challenge for investigators, sponsors and Research Ethics Committees (RECs) both locally and internationally.
Discussion: Ethical concerns relating to safety in microbicide research are a major international concern. However, in the urgency to develop a medically efficacious microbicide, some of these concerns may not have been anticipated. In the risk-benefit assessment of research protocols, both medical and psycho-social risk must be considered. In this paper four main areas that have a potential for medical and/or psycho-social harm are examined. Male partner involvement is controversial in the setting of covert use of microbicides. However, given the long-term exposure of men to experimental products, this may be methodologically, ethically and legally important. Covert use of microbicides may impact negatively on relationship dynamics leading to psychosocial harm to varying extents. The unexpectedly high rates of pregnancy during clinical trials raise important methodological and ethical concerns. Enrollment of adolescents without parental consent generates ethical and legal concerns that must be carefully considered by RECs and trial sites. Finally, paradoxical outcomes in recent trials internationally have advanced the debate on the nature of informed consent and responsibility of researchers to participants who become HIV positive during or after trials.
Summary: Phase 3 microbicide trials are an undisputed research and ethical priority in developing countries. However, such trials must be conducted with attention to both methodological and ethical detail. It is imperative that guidelines are formulated to ensure that high ethical standards are maintained despite the scientific urgency of microbicide development. Given the controversy raised by emergent ethical issues during the course of microbicide development, it is important that international consensus is reached amongst the various ethics and regulatory agencies in developing and developed countries alike.
Similar articles
-
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x. Dev World Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 19459900
-
HIV Vaccine Trial participation in South Africa - an ethical assessment.J Med Philos. 2002 Apr;27(2):197-215. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.2.197.2986. J Med Philos. 2002. PMID: 11961697
-
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x. Dev World Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19046258
-
HIV vaccine research--South Africa's ethical-legal framework and its ability to promote the welfare of trial participants.S Afr Med J. 2005 Aug;95(8):598-601. S Afr Med J. 2005. PMID: 16201004 Review.
-
Broadening inclusion of vulnerable populations in HIV vaccine trials.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008 Mar;7(2):259-68. doi: 10.1586/14760584.7.2.259. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008. PMID: 18324894 Review.
Cited by
-
Microbicides in the prevention of HIV infection: current status and future directions.Drugs. 2010 Jul 9;70(10):1231-43. doi: 10.2165/10898650-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20568831 Review.
-
Fairness and accountability of AI in disaster risk management: Opportunities and challenges.Patterns (N Y). 2021 Nov 12;2(11):100363. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100363. eCollection 2021 Nov 12. Patterns (N Y). 2021. PMID: 34820647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Framing the social in biomedical HIV prevention trials: a 20-year retrospective.J Int AIDS Soc. 2011 Sep 27;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-14-S2-S3. J Int AIDS Soc. 2011. PMID: 21968079 Free PMC article. Review.
-
National Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden.Ethics Behav. 2016 Oct 2;26(7):586-606. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1096207. Epub 2015 Nov 3. Ethics Behav. 2016. PMID: 27746664 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Partner-Related Social Harms on Women's Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring During a Phase III Trial.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 15;79(5):580-589. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001866. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018. PMID: 30239426 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- UNAIDS Ethical Considerations in HIV Preventive Vaccine Research. 2002.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical