Effects of hormone treatment on hemostasis variables
- PMID: 17882670
- DOI: 10.1080/13697130701598548
Effects of hormone treatment on hemostasis variables
Abstract
A survey was made of the changes in hemostasis and related inflammatory biomarkers for hormone treatments (HT) of women. Treatments included were oral and non-oral estrogens combined or not with progestogens, raloxifene, tamoxifene, tibolone and ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives with non-androgenic progestogens. Special attention was given to dosages lower than the present standard dose and we explored how treatment variants approached a situation of minimal changes in biomarkers. For oral unopposed estrogens, dose reduction effectively reduced the changes in some hemostasis markers, but not in a specific set of anticoagulant variables (antithrombin, protein S, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and the endogenous thrombin potential assay for resistance to activated protein C). Inflammation markers from the liver showed a dose-dependent reduction but effects were not nullified at the lowest dose tested. It was concluded that adequate reduction of estrogen dose for these effects will coincide with the dose-range of efficacy. Androgenic progestogens may be suitable for further reducing the impact of estrogens on some of the anticoagulant variables; reductions of estrogen-induced C-reactive protein increases appear possible with specific progestogens (medroxyprogesterone actate, nomegestrol acetate). For non-oral unopposed estrogens, all variables except inflammation biomarkers from the vascular wall showed minimal changes. Reduction in vascular inflammatory biomarkers, considered to mark anti-inflammatory effects, is augmented by medroxyprogesterone actate or norethisterone acetate. It was concluded that unopposed, non-oral estrogen treatment is the present best available option approaching minimal effects of treatment on biomarkers. Progestogen selection requires more data. We postulated that minimal effects on all cardiovascular biomarkers should define the HT with maximal safety for venous and arterial vascular events. The survey has identified specific biomarkers sensitive to low-dose unopposed and opposed estrogen which can be used to characterize future preparations for HT.
Similar articles
-
Differential impact of conventional and low-dose oral hormone therapy (HT), tibolone and raloxifene on functionality of the activated protein C system.Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jun;97(6):938-43. Thromb Haemost. 2007. PMID: 17549295 Clinical Trial.
-
Differential effects of conventional and low dose oral hormone therapy (HT), tibolone, and raloxifene on coagulation and fibrinolysis.Thromb Res. 2007;120(3):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.10.013. Epub 2006 Dec 15. Thromb Res. 2007. PMID: 17156824 Clinical Trial.
-
A 5-year study on the effect of hormone therapy, tibolone and raloxifene on vaginal bleeding and endometrial thickness.Maturitas. 2006 Mar 20;53(4):413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Sep 2. Maturitas. 2006. PMID: 16140483
-
Hormone therapy and hemostasis among postmenopausal women: a review.Menopause. 2014 Jul;21(7):753-62. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000296. Menopause. 2014. PMID: 24937030 Review.
-
[Hormonal contraception and substitution therapy: the importance of progestogen for cardiovascular diseases].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992 Nov;52(11):653-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1026140. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992. PMID: 1452000 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Novel effects of hormonal contraceptive use on the plasma proteome.PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045162. Epub 2012 Sep 12. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22984625 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials