Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact
- PMID: 17883482
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x
Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact
Abstract
We evaluated the intention, implementation, and impact of Costa Rica's program of payments for environmental services (PSA), which was established in the late 1990s. Payments are given to private landowners who own land in forest areas in recognition of the ecosystem services their land provides. To characterize the distribution of PSA in Costa Rica, we combined remote sensing with geographic information system databases and then used econometrics to explore the impacts of payments on deforestation. Payments were distributed broadly across ecological and socioeconomic gradients, but the 1997-2000 deforestation rate was not significantly lower in areas that received payments. Other successful Costa Rican conservation policies, including those prior to the PSA program, may explain the current reduction in deforestation rates. The PSA program is a major advance in the global institutionalization of ecosystem investments because few, if any, other countries have such a conservation history and because much can be learned from Costa Rica's experiences.
Similar articles
-
Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: a case study from Costa Rica and Mexico.J Environ Manage. 2008 Jul;88(2):348-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.015. Epub 2007 May 1. J Environ Manage. 2008. PMID: 17475393
-
Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131544. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26162000 Free PMC article.
-
Health without wealth? Costa Rica's health system under economic crisis.J Public Health Policy. 1987 Spring;8(1):86-105. J Public Health Policy. 1987. PMID: 3108317
-
The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x. Conserv Biol. 2007. PMID: 17298510 Review.
-
Reassessing the forest impacts of protection: the challenge of nonrandom location and a corrective method.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:135-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05162.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010. PMID: 20146766 Review.
Cited by
-
Are government incentives effective for avoided deforestation in the tropical Andean forest?PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203545. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30212511 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating heterogeneous conservation effects of forest protection in Indonesia.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0124872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124872. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26039754 Free PMC article.
-
Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam's PES program.PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200881. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30067791 Free PMC article.
-
Land cover and landscape changes in Shaanxi Province during China's Grain for Green Program (2000-2010).Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Oct;187(10):644. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4881-z. Epub 2015 Sep 25. Environ Monit Assess. 2015. PMID: 26407858
-
Accounting for nature's benefits: the dollar value of ecosystem services.Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Apr;120(4):A152-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.120-a152. Environ Health Perspect. 2012. PMID: 22469778 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous