Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep 20:2:12.
doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-2-12.

Evaluation of a peer counselling programme to sustain breastfeeding practice in Hong Kong

Affiliations

Evaluation of a peer counselling programme to sustain breastfeeding practice in Hong Kong

Esther Hy Wong et al. Int Breastfeed J. .

Abstract

Background: Peer counselling is reported to increase breastfeeding rates. We evaluated an intervention consisting of mainly telephone contact peer counselling programme on breastfeeding duration and exclusivity.

Methods: Peer counsellors (PCs) were mothers who had successfully breastfed and had received formal training. Following a postnatal visit, they provided scheduled telephone consultations (Days 1, 4, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and Month 4) to PC group mothers (n = 100) who continued breastfeeding their infants after discharge. Control group mothers (n = 100) received routine care.

Results: After adjusting for mothers' previous breastfeeding experiences, mothers' working status and breastfeeding problems, no statistical differences in mothers' feeding methods (exclusive, almost exclusive or predominant breastfeeding) were noted at the three follow-up times for intervention and control mothers respectively (Day 5: 37%/38%, 46%/53%, 57%/63%; Month 3: 10%/9%, 17%/23%, 20%/26%; Month 6: 2%/1%, 18%/18%, 18%/19%). All differences between the groups were not significant. Also, there was no evidence to suggest that PC intervention prolonged breastfeeding duration.

Conclusion: The lack of effect of our PC intervention may reflect the low baseline breastfeeding rate and low value placed on breastfeeding in our population, the type of PC intervention or group allocation biases.

Trial registration: ISRCTN93605280.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of study participants from recruitment period, 15 November 2001 to 30 April 2002, to 6 months post-partum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival plots of the breastfeeding duration for the intervention (n = 100, solid line) and control (n = 100, broken line) groups.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, WHO; 2003. pp. 7–8.http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/New_Publications/NUTRITION/gs...
    1. Leung GM, Ho LM, Lam TH. Breastfeeding rates in Hong Kong: a comparison of the 1987 and 1997 birth cohorts. Birth. 2002;29:162–168. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00183.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khin PP, Cheung SL, Loh T. Support and promotion of breastfeeding: where are we now? Public Health and Epidemiology Bulletin (Hong Kong, SAR, China) 2002;11:25–32.
    1. Nelson EA, Yu LM, Williams S, International Child Care Practices Study Group International Child Care Practices study: breastfeeding and pacifier use. J Hum Lact. 2005;21:289–295. doi: 10.1177/0890334405278489. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dennis CL, Hodnett E, Gallop R, Chalmers B. The effect of peer support on breast-feeding duration among primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2002;166:21–28. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources