Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction
- PMID: 17884525
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate radiologic and clinical factors associated with increased difficulty in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. We also aimed to form an index to measure the difficulty of removal of the impacted molars preoperatively.
Patients and methods: A total of 87 patients who required 90 surgical extractions of impacted mandibular third molars from November 2003 to May 2004 were involved in the study. Radiologic and clinical data were taken preoperatively. All extractions were performed under local anesthesia by a single operator. Surgical difficulty was measured by the total intervention time.
Results: Increased surgical difficulty was associated with increasing age and body mass index. It was also associated with the curvature of roots of the impacted tooth and the depth from point of elevation (P < .05).
Conclusion: Both clinical and radiologic variables are important in predicting surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extractions.
Similar articles
-
Relative impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty of removing impacted mandibular third molars.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):51-8. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008. PMID: 18473027
-
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):2714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097. Epub 2011 Jul 12. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21752507 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 May;71(5):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.001. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23598549
-
Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):771-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19304033
-
The removal of impacted third molars. Principles and procedures.Dent Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;38(2):255-78. Dent Clin North Am. 1994. PMID: 8206177 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation between Body Mass Index and the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications after Surgical Removal of the Lower Third Molar.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Mar;56(1):12-21. doi: 10.15644/asc56/1/2. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022. PMID: 35382480 Free PMC article.
-
Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012 Sep;5(3):127-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313355. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012. PMID: 23997857 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of submucosal or oral administration of prednisolone on postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized controlled study.Niger Med J. 2016 Sep-Oct;57(5):272-279. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.190599. Niger Med J. 2016. PMID: 27833246 Free PMC article.
-
Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):251-258. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.251. Epub 2016 Oct 25. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27847732 Free PMC article.
-
Preliminary results of a study comparing conventional radiography with phase-contrast radiography for assessing root morphology of mandibular third molars.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):91-5. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13833682. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21239571 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources