The Mentakab Hypertension Project. Part IV--Hypertension care: is it adequate? A criterion-based audit of hypertension care in a hospital

Abstract

An audit to assess the adequacy of hypertension care was performed by examining the records and interviewing 55 selected hypertensive patients on treatment and follow-up at the outpatient department of a hospital. The patients selected had no previous record of drop out of treatment and had excellent compliance with drug therapy, so that ineffective blood pressure control cannot be attributable to these two reasons. Adequacy of care was measured by the number of patients whose management as indicated in their records complied with pre-defined criteria of adequate care. Only 18% of patients had achieved adequate blood pressure control. Assessment of patients was inadequate. None of the patients had been screened for secondary causes though 16% of patients had some basic investigations (urinalysis, blood urea and serum potassium), 5% had an assessment of target-organ damage, and 2% had been screened for other cardiovascular risk factors. Only 5% had a surveillance of side-effects from drug-therapy, 45% of the patients demonstrate adequate knowledge concerning complications of hypertension. The use of non-drug treatment was non-existent. The results of this study suggest that there were considerable deficiencies in the management of hypertension. Measures needed to overcome this are discussed.