Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Sep 21:7:259.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-259.

The (cost-)effectiveness of an individually tailored long-term worksite health promotion programme on physical activity and nutrition: design of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Suzan J W Robroek  1 , Folef J Bredt, Alex Burdorf
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The (cost-)effectiveness of an individually tailored long-term worksite health promotion programme on physical activity and nutrition: design of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Suzan J W Robroek et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of disability and mortality in most Western countries. The prevalence of several risk factors, most notably low physical activity and poor nutrition, is very high. Therefore, lifestyle behaviour changes are of great importance. The worksite offers an efficient structure to reach large groups and to make use of a natural social network. This study investigates a worksite health promotion programme with individually tailored advice in physical activity and nutrition and individual counselling to increase compliance with lifestyle recommendations and sustainability of a healthy lifestyle.

Methods/design: The study is a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with the worksite as the unit of randomisation. All workers will receive a standard worksite health promotion program. Additionally, the intervention group will receive access to an individual Health Portal consisting of four critical features: a computer-tailored advice, a monitoring function, a personal coach, and opportunities to contact professionals at request. Participants are employees working for companies in the Netherlands, being literate enough to read and understand simple Internet-based messages in the Dutch language.A questionnaire to assess primary outcomes (compliance with national recommendations on physical activity and on fruit and vegetable intake) will take place at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. This questionnaire also assesses secondary outcomes including fat intake, self-efficacy and self-perceived barriers on physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake. Other secondary outcomes, including a cardiovascular risk profile and physical fitness, will be measured at baseline and after 24 months. Apart from the effect evaluation, a process evaluation will be carried out to gain insight into participation and adherence to the worksite health promotion programme. A cost-effectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis will be carried out as well.

Discussion: The unique combination of features makes the individually tailored worksite health promotion programme a promising tool for health promotion. It is hypothesized that the Health Portal's features will counteract loss to follow-up, and will increase compliance with the lifestyle recommendations and sustainability of a healthy lifestyle.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52854353.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of the flow to a computer tailored advice.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of the flow to a progress chart (monitoring function).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Petersen S. Peto V. Rayner M. Leal J. Luengo-Fernandez R. Gray A European cardiovascular disease statistics, 2005 edition. European Heart Network. Accessed: 15 May 2007 http://www.ehnheart.org/files/statistics%202005-092711A.pdf
    1. Sjöström M, Oja P, Hagströmer M, Smith BJ, Bauman A. Health-enhancing physical activity across European Union countries: the Eurobarometer study. J Public Health. 2006;14:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s10389-006-0031-y. - DOI
    1. Kemper HCG., W.T.M. Ooijendijk, M. Stiggelbout Consensus over de Nederlandse norm voor gezond bewegen [Consensus about the Dutch guideline for healthy physical activity] Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 2000;78:180–183.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Statline Gerapporteerde gezondheid en leefstijl [reported health and lifestyle]. Accessed: 15 May 2007 http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb
    1. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793–801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011858. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data