The human-sheep chimeras as a model for human stem cell mobilization and evaluation of hematopoietic grafts' potential
- PMID: 17889724
- PMCID: PMC2048750
- DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.07.009
The human-sheep chimeras as a model for human stem cell mobilization and evaluation of hematopoietic grafts' potential
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the sheep xenograft model of human hematopoiesis can be used to mimic mobilization of human hematopoietic stem cells in vivo.
Material and methods: Sheep transplanted with 3.6 x 10(6) CD34+ from human adult bone marrow were mobilized 1.5 years posttransplantation with human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. At day 3 and 4 of mobilization, human cells were harvested from peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) and were injected into secondary sheep recipients (n = 6) and these animals were analyzed for the presence of human cells in their BM and PB, starting at 3.5 months posttransplantation.
Results: Maximum mobilization of human cells in PB occurred at day 3, with a 21-fold increase in total numbers of human cells, and a recovery of 5.5 x 10(4)/mL CD34+. In the BM, maximal numbers of human cells were achieved at day 4, with a 6.3-fold increase and a recovery of 1.5 x 10(4)/mL CD34+ cells. PB and BM mobilized human cells were then transplanted into new sheep recipients, and analysis at 3.5 months posttransplantation demonstrated that levels of human cell engraftment in BM of the group transplanted with mobilized PB were significantly lower than those transplanted with BM cells (0.6% +/- 0.1% vs 8.0% +/- 1.8%). Furthermore, in sheep transplanted with mobilized PB, the levels of human cells in circulation remained 2.5-fold higher than the levels of human cells found in their BM.
Conclusion: Mobilization of human cells in the sheep model parallels human PB and BM hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) mobilization in healthy human donors in their ability to engraft, differentiate, and repopulate secondary hosts. Thus, this model can become a useful tool to study mobilization regimens, mechanisms, and quality of products obtained.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Kinetics of engraftment of CD34(-) and CD34(+) cells from mobilized blood differs from that of CD34(-) and CD34(+) cells from bone marrow.Exp Hematol. 2000 Sep;28(9):1071-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00506-3. Exp Hematol. 2000. PMID: 11008020
-
Persistence of human multilineage, self-renewing lymphohematopoietic stem cells in chimeric sheep.Blood. 1993 Dec 1;82(11):3333-42. Blood. 1993. PMID: 7694681
-
Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus recombinant rat stem cell factor contain long-term engrafting cells capable of cellular proliferation for more than two years as shown by serial transplantation in mice.Blood. 1995 May 1;85(9):2303-7. Blood. 1995. PMID: 7537109
-
Retention and multilineage expression of human hematopoietic stem cells in human-sheep chimeras.Stem Cells. 1995 Mar;13(2):101-11. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530130202. Stem Cells. 1995. PMID: 7787777 Review.
-
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor primed bone marrow and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cells are equivalent for engraftment: which to choose?Pediatr Transplant. 2005 Dec;9 Suppl 7:37-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00444.x. Pediatr Transplant. 2005. PMID: 16305616 Review.
Cited by
-
Maternal T cells limit engraftment after in utero hematopoietic cell transplantation in mice.J Clin Invest. 2011 Feb;121(2):582-92. doi: 10.1172/JCI44907. Epub 2011 Jan 18. J Clin Invest. 2011. PMID: 21245575 Free PMC article.
-
Transplant Tolerance Induction in Newborn Infants: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Potential Strategies.Front Immunol. 2016 Apr 7;7:116. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00116. eCollection 2016. Front Immunol. 2016. PMID: 27092138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In utero transplantation: Disparate ramifications.World J Stem Cells. 2013 Apr 26;5(2):43-52. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v5.i2.43. World J Stem Cells. 2013. PMID: 23671718 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Severe Combined Immunodeficient (SCID) Pig Models for Translational Cancer Modeling: Future Insights on How Humanized SCID Pigs Can Improve Preclinical Cancer Research.Front Oncol. 2018 Nov 30;8:559. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00559. eCollection 2018. Front Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30560086 Free PMC article.
-
In Utero Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (IUHSCT).Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 29;1(1):e2009031. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2009.031. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 21415998 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arai S, Klingemann HG. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: bone marrow vs. mobilized peripheral blood. Arch Med Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;34(6):545–53. - PubMed
-
- Russell NH, Byrne JL. Allogeneic transplantation using peripheral blood stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2001 Dec;14(4):685–700. - PubMed
-
- Theilgaard-Mönch K, Raaschou-Jensen K, Andersen H, Russell CA, Vindeløv L, Jacobsen N, Dickmeiss E. Single leukapheresis products collected from healthy donors after the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor contain ten-fold higher numbers of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic progenitor cells than conventional bone marrow allografts. BMT. 1999;23:243. - PubMed
-
- Bhatia S, Robison LL, Francisco L, Carter A, Liu Y, Grant M, Baker KS, Fung H, Gurney JG, McGlave PB, Nademanee A, Ramsay NK, Stein A, Weisdorf DJ, Forman SJ. Late mortality in survivors of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: report from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study. Blood. 2005 Feb 8; Epub ahead of print. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical