The human-sheep chimeras as a model for human stem cell mobilization and evaluation of hematopoietic grafts' potential
- PMID: 17889724
- PMCID: PMC2048750
- DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.07.009
The human-sheep chimeras as a model for human stem cell mobilization and evaluation of hematopoietic grafts' potential
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the sheep xenograft model of human hematopoiesis can be used to mimic mobilization of human hematopoietic stem cells in vivo.
Material and methods: Sheep transplanted with 3.6 x 10(6) CD34+ from human adult bone marrow were mobilized 1.5 years posttransplantation with human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. At day 3 and 4 of mobilization, human cells were harvested from peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) and were injected into secondary sheep recipients (n = 6) and these animals were analyzed for the presence of human cells in their BM and PB, starting at 3.5 months posttransplantation.
Results: Maximum mobilization of human cells in PB occurred at day 3, with a 21-fold increase in total numbers of human cells, and a recovery of 5.5 x 10(4)/mL CD34+. In the BM, maximal numbers of human cells were achieved at day 4, with a 6.3-fold increase and a recovery of 1.5 x 10(4)/mL CD34+ cells. PB and BM mobilized human cells were then transplanted into new sheep recipients, and analysis at 3.5 months posttransplantation demonstrated that levels of human cell engraftment in BM of the group transplanted with mobilized PB were significantly lower than those transplanted with BM cells (0.6% +/- 0.1% vs 8.0% +/- 1.8%). Furthermore, in sheep transplanted with mobilized PB, the levels of human cells in circulation remained 2.5-fold higher than the levels of human cells found in their BM.
Conclusion: Mobilization of human cells in the sheep model parallels human PB and BM hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) mobilization in healthy human donors in their ability to engraft, differentiate, and repopulate secondary hosts. Thus, this model can become a useful tool to study mobilization regimens, mechanisms, and quality of products obtained.
Figures







References
-
- Arai S, Klingemann HG. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: bone marrow vs. mobilized peripheral blood. Arch Med Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;34(6):545–53. - PubMed
-
- Russell NH, Byrne JL. Allogeneic transplantation using peripheral blood stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2001 Dec;14(4):685–700. - PubMed
-
- Theilgaard-Mönch K, Raaschou-Jensen K, Andersen H, Russell CA, Vindeløv L, Jacobsen N, Dickmeiss E. Single leukapheresis products collected from healthy donors after the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor contain ten-fold higher numbers of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic progenitor cells than conventional bone marrow allografts. BMT. 1999;23:243. - PubMed
-
- Bhatia S, Robison LL, Francisco L, Carter A, Liu Y, Grant M, Baker KS, Fung H, Gurney JG, McGlave PB, Nademanee A, Ramsay NK, Stein A, Weisdorf DJ, Forman SJ. Late mortality in survivors of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: report from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study. Blood. 2005 Feb 8; Epub ahead of print. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical