Automated collection of double red blood cell units with a variable-volume separation chamber
- PMID: 17894787
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01492.x
Automated collection of double red blood cell units with a variable-volume separation chamber
Abstract
Background: Automated collection of blood components offers multiple advantages and has prompted development of portable devices. This study sought to document the biochemical and hematologic properties and in vivo recovery of red cells (RBCs) collected via a new device that employed a variable-volume centrifugal separation chamber.
Study design and methods: Normal subjects (n = 153) donated 2 units of RBCs via an automated blood collection system (Cymbal, Haemonetics). Procedures were conducted with wall outlet power (n = 49) or the device's battery source (n = 104). Units were collected with or without leukoreduction filtration and were stored in AS-3 for 42 days. The units were assessed via standard biochemical and hematologic tests before and after storage, and 24 leukoreduced (LR) and 24 non-LR RBCs were radiolabeled on Day 42 with Na(2)(51)CrO(4) for autologous return to determine recovery at 24 hours with concomitant determination of RBC volume via infusion of (99m)Tc-labeled fresh RBCs.
Results: Two standard RBC units (targeted to contain 180 mL of RBCs plus 100 mL of AS-3) could be collected in 35.7 +/- 2.0 minutes (n = 30) or 40.3 +/- 2.7 minutes for LR RBCs (n = 92). An additional 31 collections were conducted successfully with intentional filter bypassing. RBC units contained 104 +/- 4.1 percent of their targeted volumes (170-204 mL of RBCs), and LR RBCs contained 92 percent of non-LR RBCs' hemoglobin. All LR RBCs contained less than 1 x 10(6) white blood cells. Mean hemolysis was below 0.8 percent (Day 42) for all configurations. Adenosine triphosphate was well preserved. Mean recovery was 82 +/- 4.9 percent for RBCs and 84 +/- 7.0 percent for LR RBCs.
Conclusions: The Cymbal device provided quick and efficient collection of 2 RBC units with properties meeting regulatory requirements and consistent with good clinical utility.
Similar articles
-
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of LEUKOSEP HRC-600-C leukoreduction filtration system for red cells.Transfusion. 2006 Aug;46(8):1311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00897.x. Transfusion. 2006. PMID: 16934065 Clinical Trial.
-
In vitro quality of red blood cells (RBCs) collected by multicomponent apheresis compared to manually collected RBCs during 49 days of storage.Transfusion. 2007 Apr;47(4):687-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01172.x. Transfusion. 2007. PMID: 17381628
-
[Analysis of the quality of hemoderivatives obtained using a buffy-coat extraction system with a top-and-bottom technique (Optipress II)].Sangre (Barc). 1999 Oct;44(5):319-26. Sangre (Barc). 1999. PMID: 10618907 Spanish.
-
Red blood cells intended for transfusion: quality criteria revisited.Transfusion. 2006 Jan;46(1):137-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00681.x. Transfusion. 2006. PMID: 16398743 Review.
-
Blood component collection by apheresis.J Clin Apher. 2006 Jul;21(2):142-51. doi: 10.1002/jca.20043. J Clin Apher. 2006. PMID: 15880369 Review.
Cited by
-
Automation in Blood Centre: Its impact on Blood Safety.Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Apr;9(Suppl 1):S6-S10. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.157016. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015. PMID: 26097331 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials